# When Can Large Reasoning Models Save Thinking? Mechanistic Analysis of Behavioral Divergence in Reasoning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.15276 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.15276/

## Key facts

- Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 19 of its 33 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 May 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Test-time compute and efficient thinking](https://mlsanity.com/lr/test-time-compute-and-efficient-thinking/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [Qwen2.5 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15115/) (2024)
- [A Survey of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.18223/) (2023)
- [Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03314/) (2024)
- [s1: Simple test-time scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.19393/) (2025)
- [DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.19437/) (2024)
- [Do NOT Think That Much for 2+3=? On the Overthinking of o1-Like LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.21187/) (2024)
- [GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.04043/) (2019)
- [Stop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.16419/) (2025)
- [Towards Reasoning Era: A Survey of Long Chain-of-Thought for Reasoning Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.09567/) (2025)
- [Towards Large Reasoning Models: A Survey of Reinforced Reasoning with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.09686/) (2025)
- [Dynamic Early Exit in Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.15895/) (2025)
- [Reasoning Models Can Be Effective Without Thinking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.09858/) (2025)
- [The Ultimate Guide to Fine-Tuning LLMs from Basics to Breakthroughs: An Exhaustive Review of Technologies, Research, Best Practices, Applied Research Challenges and Opportunities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.13296/) (2024)
- [Mitigating Lost-in-Retrieval Problems in Retrieval Augmented Multi-Hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14245/) (2025)
- [Mathify: Evaluating Large Language Models on Mathematical Problem Solving Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.13099/) (2024)
- [Thinking Out Loud: Do Reasoning Models Know When They're Right?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.06564/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Towards Concise and Adaptive Thinking in Large Reasoning Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.09662/) (2025)
- [Towards a Mechanistic Understanding of Large Reasoning Models: A Survey of Training, Inference, and Failures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.19928/) (2026)
- [The Zero-Step Thinking: An Empirical Study of Mode Selection as Harder Early Exit in Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.19176/) (2025)
- [Answering the Unanswerable Is to Err Knowingly: Analyzing and Mitigating Abstention Failures in Large Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.18760/) (2025)
- [QA-Merging: Query-Adaptive Reasoning via Layer Selective Model Merging](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.03506/) (2026)
- [</think> Doesn't Stop Reasoning: Analysis of Spurious CoT Termination](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.03633/) (2026)
- [The Differential Reasoning Router: Operationalizing Cost-Aware LLM Annotation in E-commerce](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.30224/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large reasoning models (LRMs) have achieved remarkable success on complex tasks, yet their tendency to "overthink" leads to inefficiencies. Although "save-thinking" prompts are intended to mitigate this issue, we find that LRMs still frequently enter the "Still-thinking" mode instead of the expected "No-thinking" mode, especially on difficult queries. To analyze this behavioral divergence, we examine LRMs from three perspectives: confidence at the thinking-termination boundary, divergence in internal attention distributions, and attention allocation across prompt segments. We find that high perplexity is associated with later Still-thinking behavior, and that Still-thinking cases allocate more attention to the original question. Based on these observations, we propose an attention intervention method to regulate this behavior. While this intervention suppresses explicit thinking, it also causes a drop in accuracy, suggesting that the suppressed reasoning behavior is often useful for correctness. Our work provides confidence- and attention-level evidence for this behavior, highlighting the trade-off between instruction following, inference efficiency, and reasoning correctness.