# MORALISE: A Structured Benchmark for Moral Alignment in Visual Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.14728 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14728/

## Key facts

- Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 36 of its 51 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 May 2025.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/vlm-benchmarks-and-visual-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 36)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.14198/) (2022)
- [BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.12086/) (2022)
- [Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.05530/) (2024)
- [Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.09513/) (2022)
- [Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phone](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.14219/) (2024)
- [Gemma 3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.19786/) (2025)
- [ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12793/) (2024)
- [StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.09456/) (2020)
- [Vision-Language Models for Vision Tasks: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.00685/) (2023)
- [Aligning AI With Shared Human Values](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.02275/) (2020)
- [Object Hallucination in Image Captioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.02156/) (2018)
- [Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.00770/) (2023)
- [DriveVLM: The Convergence of Autonomous Driving and Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.12289/) (2024)
- [Social Chemistry 101: Learning to Reason about Social and Moral Norms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.00620/) (2020)
- [Evaluating the Moral Beliefs Encoded in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.14324/) (2023)
- [PhysBench: Benchmarking and Enhancing Vision-Language Models for Physical World Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.16411/) (2025)
- [Vision Language Models in Autonomous Driving: A Survey and Outlook](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.14414/) (2023)
- [VLP: Vision Language Planning for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.05577/) (2024)
- [Vision-Language Models for Medical Report Generation and Visual Question Answering: A Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.02469/) (2024)
- [The Moral Integrity Corpus: A Benchmark for Ethical Dialogue Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.03021/) (2022)
- [Moral Foundations of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.15337/) (2023)
- [SPA-VL: A Comprehensive Safety Preference Alignment Dataset for Vision Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12030/) (2024)
- [SafeBench: A Safety Evaluation Framework for Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.18927/) (2024)
- [VLMbench: A Compositional Benchmark for Vision-and-Language Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.08522/) (2022)
- [VHELM: A Holistic Evaluation of Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07112/) (2024)
- [MoralBench: Moral Evaluation of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04428/) (2024)
- [VILA-M3: Enhancing Vision-Language Models with Medical Expert Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.12915/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Subspace Alignment for Vision-Language Model Test-time Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.08139/) (2026)
- [Mixture of Sequence: Theme-Aware Mixture-of-Experts for Long-Sequence Recommendation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.20858/) (2026)
- [Moral Sycophancy in Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.08311/) (2026)
- [Predict, Don't Iterate: Efficient Adaptive-Length Infilling for Diffusion Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.02108/) (2026)
- [NormAct: Benchmarking Embodied Agents' Proactive Compliance with Unspoken Social Norms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.27826/) (2026)
- [Graph Homophily Booster: Rethinking the Role of Discrete Features on Heterophilic Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.12530/) (2025)
- [Graph homophily booster: Reimagining the role of discrete features in heterophilic graph learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.07256/) (2026)
- [Spot The Ball: A Benchmark for Visual Social Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.00261/) (2025)
- [Do VLMs Have a Moral Backbone? A Study on the Fragile Morality of Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.17082/) (2026)
- [Structuring and Tokenizing Distributed User Interest Context for Generative Recommendation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.20554/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Warning: This paper contains examples of harmful language and images. Reader discretion is advised. Recently, vision-language models have demonstrated increasing influence in morally sensitive domains such as autonomous driving and medical analysis, owing to their powerful multimodal reasoning capabilities. As these models are deployed in high-stakes real-world applications, it is of paramount importance to ensure that their outputs align with human moral values and remain within moral boundaries. However, existing work on moral alignment either focuses solely on textual modalities or relies heavily on AI-generated images, leading to distributional biases and reduced realism. To overcome these limitations, we introduce MORALISE, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating the moral alignment of vision-language models (VLMs) using diverse, expert-verified real-world data. We begin by proposing a comprehensive taxonomy of 13 moral topics grounded in Turiel's Domain Theory, spanning the personal, interpersonal, and societal moral domains encountered in everyday life. Built on this framework, we manually curate 2,481 high-quality image-text pairs, each annotated with two fine-grained labels: (1) topic annotation, identifying the violated moral topic(s), and (2) modality annotation, indicating whether the violation arises from the image or the text. For evaluation, we encompass two tasks, textitmoral judgment and textitmoral norm attribution, to assess models' awareness of moral violations and their reasoning ability on morally salient content. Extensive experiments on 19 popular open- and closed-source VLMs show that MORALISE poses a significant challenge, revealing persistent moral limitations in current state-of-the-art models. The full benchmark is publicly available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/Ze1025/MORALISE.