# AneumoBench: A Source-Linked Benchmark for Synthetic-Geometry Transfer in Aneurysm CFD

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.14717 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14717/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 20 of its 40 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 May 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.04597/) (2015)
- [Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.02216/) (2017)
- [PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00593/) (2016)
- [Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.08895/) (2020)
- [DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.03193/) (2019)
- [Graph U-Nets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.05178/) (2019)
- [PDEBENCH: An Extensive Benchmark for Scientific Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.07182/) (2022)
- [Choose a Transformer: Fourier or Galerkin](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.14995/) (2021)
- [Transolver: A Fast Transformer Solver for PDEs on General Geometries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.02366/) (2024)
- [U-FNO -- An enhanced Fourier neural operator-based deep-learning model for multiphase flow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.03697/) (2021)
- [Factorized Fourier Neural Operators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.13802/) (2021)
- [U-NO: U-shaped Neural Operators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.11127/) (2022)
- [AirfRANS: High Fidelity Computational Fluid Dynamics Dataset for Approximating Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Solutions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.07564/) (2022)
- [DrivAerNet++: A Large-Scale Multimodal Car Dataset with Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Deep Learning Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.09624/) (2024)
- [APEBench: A Benchmark for Autoregressive Neural Emulators of PDEs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.00180/) (2024)
- [IntrA: 3D Intracranial Aneurysm Dataset for Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.02920/) (2020)
- [LagrangeBench: A Lagrangian Fluid Mechanics Benchmarking Suite](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16342/) (2023)
- [Towards automated brain aneurysm detection in TOF-MRA: open data, weak labels, and anatomical knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.06168/) (2021)
- [MeshMask: Physics-Based Simulations with Masked Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.08738/) (2025)
- [AFBench: A Large-scale Benchmark for Airfoil Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.18846/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Inpainting physics: self-supervised learning for context-driven fluid simulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.08832/) (2026)
- [SynVA: A Modular Toolkit for Vessel Generation and Aneurysm Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.17620/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Scientific machine learning uses simulation data to train surrogate models for fast physical-field prediction across geometries. Local shape editing can expand limited geometry collections, but whether its variants improve prediction on unseen geometries, and how to allocate them across sources, require controlled evaluation. We introduce AneumoBench, a dataset and benchmark linking 401 source aneurysm geometries to 9,693 locally edited descendant records, with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) fields computed on both. It contains 80,752 steady velocity-pressure cases across eight inlet conditions and 9,715 transient sequences of velocity, pressure, and wall shear stress (WSS). Each sequence contains 100 frames sampled at 0.01-s intervals from a 1-s cardiac cycle. Mesh, point, and voxel interfaces support steady field prediction and WSS forecasting from four observed frames. With family-disjoint splits, we compare source-only training, descendant training, and descendant pretraining followed by source fine-tuning across nine architectures on 79 held-out sources. Under the reported schedules, two-stage training lowers steady-field and reset-window WSS errors relative to source-only training. With the number of sampled fields and training updates fixed within each comparison, GraphSAGE benefits from descendant training and from distributing a fixed number of descendants across more sources. For WSS, reset-window gains do not consistently persist through 96-step rollout, and lower trajectory error need not improve cycle-level shear metrics or hotspot localization. These data and protocols enable researchers to compare descendant selection and training strategies on the same unseen source geometries.