# Process vs. Outcome Reward: Which is Better for Agentic RAG Reinforcement Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.14069 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14069/

## Key facts

- Cited by 70 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Agentic RAG, agents and memory, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation.
- Builds on 60 of its 77 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 May 2025.

## Placed in

- Retrieval-augmented generation / [Agentic RAG, agents and memory](https://mlsanity.com/rag/agentic-rag-agents-and-memory/)
- LLM agents and tool use / [Web, search, and research agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/web-search-and-research-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 60)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02311/) (2022)
- [Qwen2.5 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15115/) (2024)
- [GPT-4o System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21276/) (2024)
- [Let's Verify Step by Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20050/) (2023)
- [HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.09600/) (2018)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.10997/) (2023)
- [Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.03629/) (2022)
- [Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.11511/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.05232/) (2023)
- [Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.09516/) (2025)
- [Constructing A Multi-hop QA Dataset for Comprehensive Evaluation of Reasoning Steps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.01060/) (2020)
- [Kimi k1.5: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12599/) (2025)
- [Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03350/) (2022)
- [Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.08935/) (2023)
- [Interleaving Retrieval with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Knowledge-Intensive Multi-Step Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10509/) (2022)
- [MuSiQue: Multihop Questions via Single-hop Question Composition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.00573/) (2021)
- [SFT Memorizes, RL Generalizes: A Comparative Study of Foundation Model Post-training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.17161/) (2025)
- [Active Retrieval Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.06983/) (2023)
- [LongLLMLingua: Accelerating and Enhancing LLMs in Long Context Scenarios via Prompt Compression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06839/) (2023)
- [A Survey on RAG Meeting LLMs: Towards Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.06211/) (2024)
- [Adaptive-RAG: Learning to Adapt Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models through Question Complexity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.14403/) (2024)
- [Improve Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models by Automated Process Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.06592/) (2024)
- [Search-o1: Agentic Search-Enhanced Large Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.05366/) (2025)
- [Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models with Iterative Retrieval-Generation Synergy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15294/) (2023)
- [Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Medicine](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.13178/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 70)

- [A Survey of Context Engineering for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.13334/) (2025)
- [Chain-of-Agents: End-to-End Agent Foundation Models via Multi-Agent Distillation and Agentic RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.13167/) (2025)
- [Tree Search for LLM Agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.21240/) (2025)
- [Deep Research: A Survey of Autonomous Research Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.12752/) (2025)
- [A Survey of LLM-based Deep Search Agents: Paradigm, Optimization, Evaluation, and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.05668/) (2025)
- [Information Gain-based Policy Optimization: A Simple and Effective Approach for Multi-Turn Search Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.14967/) (2025)
- [A Survey of Process Reward Models: From Outcome Signals to Process Supervisions for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.08049/) (2025)
- [CriticSearch: Fine-Grained Credit Assignment for Search Agents via a Retrospective Critic](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.12159/) (2025)
- [A Comprehensive Survey on Reinforcement Learning-based Agentic Search: Foundations, Roles, Optimizations, Evaluations, and Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.16724/) (2025)
- [Search-P1: Path-Centric Reward Shaping for Stable and Efficient Agentic RAG Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.22576/) (2026)
- [Reinforcement Learning Foundations for Deep Research Systems: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.06733/) (2025)
- [SmartSearch: Process Reward-Guided Query Refinement for Search Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.04888/) (2026)
- [The Art of Building Verifiers for Computer Use Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.06240/) (2026)
- [Personalize Before Retrieve: LLM-based Personalized Query Expansion for User-Centric Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.08935/) (2025)
- [Spark: Strategic Policy-Aware Exploration via Dynamic Branching for Long-Horizon Agentic Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.20209/) (2026)
- [Search-R2: Enhancing Search-Integrated Reasoning via Actor-Refiner Collaboration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.03647/) (2026)
- [DeepResearch-9K: A Challenging Benchmark Dataset of Deep-Research Agent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.01152/) (2026)
- [TRACE: A Unified Rollout Budget Allocation Framework for Efficient Agentic Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.11119/) (2026)
- [DecEx-RAG: Boosting Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Decision and Execution Optimization via Process Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.05691/) (2025)
- [Agentic Environment Engineering for Large Language Models: A Survey of Environment Modeling, Synthesis, Evaluation, and Application](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.12191/) (2026)
- [TeaRAG: A Token-Efficient Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.05385/) (2025)
- [Reward Modeling for Reinforcement Learning-Based LLM Reasoning: Design, Challenges, and Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.09305/) (2026)
- [OASES: Outcome-Aligned Search-Evaluation Co-Training for Agentic Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.03675/) (2026)
- [How Many Tools Should an LLM Agent See? A Chance-Corrected Answer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.24660/) (2026)
- [CoLD: Counterfactually-Guided Length Debiasing for Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.15698/) (2025)
- [From Sufficiency to Reflection: Reinforcement-Guided Thinking Quality in Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.22716/) (2025)
- [MetaAgent: Toward Self-Evolving Agent via Tool Meta-Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.00271/) (2025)
- [Think Before You Retrieve: Learning Test-Time Adaptive Search with Small Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.07581/) (2025)
- [CARL: Criticality-Aware Agentic Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.04949/) (2025)
- [TreePS-RAG: Tree-based Process Supervision for Reinforcement Learning in Agentic RAG](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.06922/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances the text generation capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by integrating external knowledge and up-to-date information. However, traditional RAG systems are limited by static workflows and lack the adaptability required for multistep reasoning and complex task management. To address these limitations, agentic RAG systems (e.g., DeepResearch) have been proposed, enabling dynamic retrieval strategies, iterative context refinement, and adaptive workflows for handling complex search queries beyond the capabilities of conventional RAG. Recent advances, such as Search-R1, have demonstrated promising gains using outcome-based reinforcement learning, where the correctness of the final answer serves as the reward signal. Nevertheless, such outcome-supervised agentic RAG methods face challenges including low exploration efficiency, gradient conflict, and sparse reward signals. To overcome these challenges, we propose to utilize fine-grained, process-level rewards to improve training stability, reduce computational costs, and enhance efficiency. Specifically, we introduce a novel method ReasonRAG that automatically constructs RAG-ProGuide, a high-quality dataset providing process-level rewards for (i) query generation, (ii) evidence extraction, and (iii) answer generation, thereby enhancing model inherent capabilities via process-supervised reinforcement learning. With the process-level policy optimization, the proposed framework empowers LLMs to autonomously invoke search, generate queries, extract relevant evidence, and produce final answers. Compared to existing approaches such as Search-R1 and traditional RAG systems, ReasonRAG, leveraging RAG-ProGuide, achieves superior performance on five benchmark datasets using only 5k training instances, significantly fewer than the 90k training instances required by Search-R1.