# Stronger Together: Unleashing the Social Impact of Hate Speech Research

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.13251 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.13251/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 34 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 May 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.04009/) (2017)
- [Large Scale Crowdsourcing and Characterization of Twitter Abusive Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.00393/) (2018)
- [Racial Bias in Hate Speech and Abusive Language Detection Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.12516/) (2019)
- [Demographic Dialectal Variation in Social Media: A Case Study of African-American English](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.08868/) (2016)
- [Directions in Abusive Language Training Data: Garbage In, Garbage Out](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.01670/) (2020)
- [Mapping Languages: The Corpus of Global Language Use](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.00798/) (2020)
- [A systematic review of Hate Speech automatic detection using Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.00742/) (2021)
- [Cross-Cultural Transfer Learning for Chinese Offensive Language Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17927/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The advent of the internet has been both a blessing and a curse for once marginalised communities. When used well, the internet can be used to connect and establish communities crossing different intersections; however, it can also be used as a tool to alienate people and communities as well as perpetuate hate, misinformation, and disinformation especially on social media platforms. We propose steering hate speech research and researchers away from pre-existing computational solutions and consider social methods to inform social solutions to address this social problem. In a similar way linguistics research can inform language planning policy, linguists should apply what we know about language and society to mitigate some of the emergent risks and dangers of anti-social behaviour in digital spaces. We argue linguists and NLP researchers can play a principle role in unleashing the social impact potential of linguistics research working alongside communities, advocates, activists, and policymakers to enable equitable digital inclusion and to close the digital divide.