# Auditing Meta-Cognitive Hallucinations in Reasoning Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.13143 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.13143/

## Key facts

- Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Hallucination detection and mitigation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 23 of its 76 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 May 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Hallucination detection and mitigation](https://mlsanity.com/lr/hallucination-detection-and-mitigation/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Know](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.05221/) (2022)
- [Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Prompting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.04388/) (2023)
- [Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.12588/) (2022)
- [A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04023/) (2023)
- [Do NOT Think That Much for 2+3=? On the Overthinking of o1-Like LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.21187/) (2024)
- [Towards Reasoning Era: A Survey of Long Chain-of-Thought for Reasoning Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.09567/) (2025)
- [From System 1 to System 2: A Survey of Reasoning Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.17419/) (2025)
- [A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination Mitigation Techniques in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.01313/) (2024)
- [Logic-RL: Unleashing LLM Reasoning with Rule-Based Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14768/) (2025)
- [Chain-of-Thought Reasoning In The Wild Is Not Always Faithful](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.08679/) (2025)
- [Do Large Language Models Latently Perform Multi-Hop Reasoning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.16837/) (2024)
- [The Impact of Reasoning Step Length on Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.04925/) (2024)
- [Beyond Accuracy: Evaluating the Reasoning Behavior of Large Language Models -- A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.01869/) (2024)
- [A Survey of Reasoning with Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.11562/) (2023)
- [Natural Language Reasoning, A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.14725/) (2023)
- [Step Back to Leap Forward: Self-Backtracking for Boosting Reasoning of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.04404/) (2025)
- [Reflection-Tuning: Data Recycling Improves LLM Instruction-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.11716/) (2023)
- [On the Emergence of Thinking in LLMs I: Searching for the Right Intuition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.06773/) (2025)
- [A Survey on LLM Test-Time Compute via Search: Tasks, LLM Profiling, Search Algorithms, and Relevant Frameworks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.10069/) (2025)
- [Wrong-of-Thought: An Integrated Reasoning Framework with Multi-Perspective Verification and Wrong Information](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.04463/) (2024)
- [Instruct-of-Reflection: Enhancing Large Language Models Iterative Reflection Capabilities via Dynamic-Meta Instruction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.00902/) (2025)
- [Lachesis: Predicting LLM Inference Accuracy using Structural Properties of Reasoning Paths](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.08281/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthiness in Reasoning with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.03871/) (2025)
- [FIRE-Bench: Evaluating AI Agents on the Rediscovery of Scientific Insights](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.02905/) (2026)
- [Joint Evaluation of Answer and Reasoning Consistency for Hallucination Detection in Large Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.04832/) (2025)
- [Thinking in Uncertainty: Mitigating Hallucinations in MLRMs with Latent Entropy-Aware Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.13366/) (2026)
- [ThinkRouter: Efficient Reasoning via Routing Thinking between Latent and Discrete Spaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.11683/) (2026)
- [Agentic Services Computing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.24380/) (2025)
- [Diagnosing Visual Reasoning: Challenges, Insights, and a Path Forward](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.20696/) (2025)
- [Towards a Mechanistic Understanding of Large Reasoning Models: A Survey of Training, Inference, and Failures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.19928/) (2026)
- [Streaming Hallucination Detection in Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.02170/) (2026)
- [Fine-Tuning Language Models to Know What They Know](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.02605/) (2026)
- [Self-Reference in Large Language Models: The Introspection Threshold for Recursive Self-Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.04277/) (2026)
- [MIDAS: Multi-Image Dispersion and Semantic Reconstruction for Jailbreaking MLLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.00565/) (2026)
- [Think Less, Know More: State-Aware Reasoning Compression with Knowledge Guidance for Efficient Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.09150/) (2026)
- [Enhancing LLM Metacognition via Cognitive Pairwise Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.00869/) (2026)
- [Metacognition in LLMs: Foundations, Progress, and Opportunities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.11881/) (2026)
- [ClueTracer: Question-to-Vision Clue Tracing for Training-Free Hallucination Suppression in Multimodal Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.02004/) (2026)
- [ReBeCA: Unveiling Interpretable Behavior Hierarchy behind the Iterative Self-Reflection of Language Models with Causal Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.06373/) (2026)
- [Disentangling Deception and Hallucination Failures in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.14529/) (2026)
- [AI Knows What's Wrong But Cannot Fix It: Helicoid Dynamics in Frontier LLMs Under High-Stakes Decisions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.11559/) (2026)
- [Uncertainty Quantification for LLM Agents: A Taxonomy, an Evaluation Protocol, and an Empirical Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.07395/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The development of Reasoning Large Language Models (RLLMs) has significantly improved multi-step reasoning capabilities, but it has also made hallucination problems more frequent and harder to eliminate. While existing approaches mitigate hallucinations through external knowledge integration, model parameter analysis, or self-verification, they often fail to capture how hallucinations emerge and evolve across the reasoning chain. In this work, we study the causality of hallucinations under constrained knowledge domains by auditing the Chain-of-Thought (CoT) trajectory and assessing the model's cognitive confidence in potentially erroneous or biased claims. Our analysis reveals that in long-CoT settings, RLLMs can iteratively reinforce biases and errors through flawed reflective reasoning, eventually leading to hallucinated reasoning paths. Surprisingly, even direct interventions at the origin of hallucinations often fail to reverse their effects, as reasoning chains exhibit 'chain disloyalty' -- a resistance to correction and a tendency to preserve flawed logic. Furthermore, we show that existing hallucination detection methods are less reliable and interpretable than previously assumed in complex reasoning scenarios. Unlike methods such as circuit tracing that require access to model internals, our black-box auditing approach supports interpretable long-chain hallucination attribution, offering better generalizability and practical utility. Our code is available at: https://github.com/Winnie-Lian/AHa_Meta_Cognitive
