# Correspondence of high-dimensional emotion structures elicited by video clips between humans and Multimodal LLMs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.12746 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.12746/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Multimodal emotion understanding, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 16 of its 41 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 May 2025.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Multimodal emotion understanding](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/multimodal-emotion-understanding/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.12597/) (2023)
- [Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03744/) (2023)
- [Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00837/) (2016)
- [Towards VQA Models That Can Read](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.08920/) (2019)
- [MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13394/) (2023)
- [GLM-130B: An Open Bilingual Pre-trained Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.02414/) (2022)
- [Perception Test: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Multimodal Video Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13786/) (2023)
- [Video-of-Thought: Step-by-Step Video Reasoning from Perception to Cognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.03230/) (2024)
- [Emotion-LLaMA: Multimodal Emotion Recognition and Reasoning with Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11161/) (2024)
- [Large language models predict human sensory judgments across six modalities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.01308/) (2023)
- [GPT-4V with Emotion: A Zero-shot Benchmark for Generalized Emotion Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.04293/) (2023)
- [EmoCLIP: A Vision-Language Method for Zero-Shot Video Facial Expression Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.16640/) (2023)
- [Can't See the Forest for the Trees: Benchmarking Multimodal Safety Awareness for Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.11184/) (2025)
- [Gromov-Wasserstein unsupervised alignment reveals structural correspondences between the color similarity structures of humans and large language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.04381/) (2023)
- [Revisiting Sentiment Analysis for Software Engineering in the Era of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.11113/) (2023)
- [EmoVerse: Exploring Multimodal Large Language Models for Sentiment and Emotion Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.08049/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Bridging the behavior-neural gap: A multimodal AI reveals the brain's geometry of emotion more accurately than human self-reports](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.24298/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent studies have revealed that human emotions exhibit a high-dimensional, complex structure. A full capturing of this complexity requires new approaches, as conventional models that disregard high dimensionality risk overlooking key nuances of human emotions. Here, we examined the extent to which the latest generation of rapidly evolving Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) capture these high-dimensional, intricate emotion structures, including capabilities and limitations. Specifically, we compared self-reported emotion ratings from participants watching videos with model-generated estimates (e.g., Gemini or GPT). We evaluated performance not only at the individual video level but also from emotion structures that account for inter-video relationships. At the level of simple correlation between emotion structures, our results demonstrated strong similarity between human and model-inferred emotion structures. To further explore whether the similarity between humans and models is at the signle item level or the coarse-categorical level, we applied Gromov Wasserstein Optimal Transport. We found that although performance was not necessarily high at the strict, single-item level, performance across video categories that elicit similar emotions was substantial, indicating that the model could infer human emotional experiences at the category level. Our results suggest that current state-of-the-art MLLMs broadly capture the complex high-dimensional emotion structures at the category level, as well as their apparent limitations in accurately capturing entire structures at the single-item level.