# Enriching Patent Claim Generation with European Patent Dataset

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.12568 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.12568/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 21 of its 35 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 May 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.16634/) (2023)
- [LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.13372/) (2024)
- [ERNIE 2.0: A Continual Pre-training Framework for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.12412/) (2019)
- [BIGPATENT: A Large-Scale Dataset for Abstractive and Coherent Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.03741/) (2019)
- [SaulLM-7B: A pioneering Large Language Model for Law](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03883/) (2024)
- [Patent Claim Generation by Fine-Tuning OpenAI GPT-2](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.02052/) (2019)
- [The Harvard USPTO Patent Dataset: A Large-Scale, Well-Structured, and Multi-Purpose Corpus of Patent Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.04043/) (2022)
- [Natural Language Processing in the Patent Domain: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.04105/) (2024)
- [Can Large Language Models Generate High-quality Patent Claims?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.19465/) (2024)
- [Patent Retrieval: A Literature Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1701.00324/) (2017)
- [AutoPatent: A Multi-Agent Framework for Automatic Patent Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.09796/) (2024)
- [PatentMatch: A Dataset for Matching Patent Claims & Prior Art](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.13919/) (2020)
- [Large Language Models are Miscalibrated In-Context Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.13772/) (2023)
- [PatentGPT: A Large Language Model for Intellectual Property](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.18255/) (2024)
- [Towards Better Evaluation for Generated Patent Claims](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.11095/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Reasoning for Hierarchical Text Classification: The Case of Patents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.07167/) (2025)
- [Pointer-Augmented Autoregressive Generation of Patent Claims with Joint Topology and Content Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.24040/) (2026)
- [Can Large Language Models Understand As Well As Apply Patent Regulations to Pass a Hands-On Patent Attorney Test?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.10576/) (2025)
- [Adaptive Multi-Stage Patent Claim Generation with Unified Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.09120/) (2026)
- [Benchmarking Patent Drafting from Inventor-Style Disclosures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.21249/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Drafting patent claims is time-intensive, costly, and requires professional skill. Therefore, researchers have investigated large language models (LLMs) to assist inventors in writing claims. However, existing work has largely relied on datasets from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). To enlarge research scope regarding various jurisdictions, drafting conventions, and legal standards, we introduce EPD, a European patent dataset. EPD presents rich textual data and structured metadata to support multiple patent-related tasks, including claim generation. This dataset enriches the field in three critical aspects: (1) Jurisdictional diversity: Patents from different offices vary in legal and drafting conventions. EPD fills a critical gap by providing a benchmark for European patents to enable more comprehensive evaluation. (2) Quality improvement: EPD offers high-quality granted patents with finalized and legally approved texts, whereas others consist of patent applications that are unexamined or provisional. Experiments show that LLMs fine-tuned on EPD significantly outperform those trained on previous datasets and even GPT-4o in claim quality and cross-domain generalization. (3) Real-world simulation: We propose a difficult subset of EPD to better reflect real-world challenges of claim generation. Results reveal that all tested LLMs perform substantially worse on these challenging samples, which highlights the need for future research.