# Reasoning by Superposition: A Theoretical Perspective on Chain of Continuous Thought

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.12514 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.12514/

## Key facts

- Cited by 77 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 41 of its 51 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 May 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/prompting-and-chain-of-thought-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 41)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embedding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.09864/) (2021)
- [Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.10625/) (2022)
- [Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.08935/) (2023)
- [Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.06769/) (2024)
- [MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.12284/) (2023)
- [What learning algorithm is in-context learning? Investigations with linear models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.15661/) (2022)
- [Decomposed Prompting: A Modular Approach for Solving Complex Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.02406/) (2022)
- [MAmmoTH: Building Math Generalist Models through Hybrid Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.05653/) (2023)
- [Are Transformers universal approximators of sequence-to-sequence functions?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.10077/) (2019)
- [TravelPlanner: A Benchmark for Real-World Planning with Language Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01622/) (2024)
- [Towards Revealing the Mystery behind Chain of Thought: A Theoretical Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15408/) (2023)
- [Transformers Learn Shortcuts to Automata](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.10749/) (2022)
- [Think before you speak: Training Language Models With Pause Tokens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02226/) (2023)
- [Chain of Thought Empowers Transformers to Solve Inherently Serial Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.12875/) (2024)
- [Can Language Models Solve Graph Problems in Natural Language?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10037/) (2023)
- [GPT4Graph: Can Large Language Models Understand Graph Structured Data ? An Empirical Evaluation and Benchmarking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15066/) (2023)
- [The Parallelism Tradeoff: Limitations of Log-Precision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.00729/) (2022)
- [Let's Think Dot by Dot: Hidden Computation in Transformer Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.15758/) (2024)
- [Talk like a Graph: Encoding Graphs for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.04560/) (2023)
- [Inductive Biases and Variable Creation in Self-Attention Mechanisms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.10090/) (2021)
- [NATURAL PLAN: Benchmarking LLMs on Natural Language Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04520/) (2024)
- [Physics of Language Models: Part 2.1, Grade-School Math and the Hidden Reasoning Process](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.20311/) (2024)
- [Self-Attention Networks Can Process Bounded Hierarchical Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.11115/) (2021)
- [LLMs Still Can't Plan; Can LRMs? A Preliminary Evaluation of OpenAI's o1 on PlanBench](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.13373/) (2024)
- [Token Assorted: Mixing Latent and Text Tokens for Improved Language Model Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.03275/) (2025)
- [On the Computational Power of Transformers and its Implications in Sequence Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.09286/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 77)

- [Scaling Latent Reasoning via Looped Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.25741/) (2025)
- [Reasoning Beyond Language: A Comprehensive Survey on Latent Chain-of-Thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.16782/) (2025)
- [Latent Collaboration in Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.20639/) (2025)
- [SIM-CoT: Supervised Implicit Chain-of-Thought](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.20317/) (2025)
- [Implicit Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.02350/) (2025)
- [The Latent Space: Foundation, Evolution, Mechanism, Ability, and Outlook](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.02029/) (2026)
- [LLMs are Single-threaded Reasoners: Demystifying the Working Mechanism of Soft Thinking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.03440/) (2025)
- [Continuous Chain of Thought Enables Parallel Exploration and Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23648/) (2025)
- [Soft Tokens, Hard Truths](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.19170/) (2025)
- [Coevolutionary Continuous Discrete Diffusion: Make Your Diffusion Language Model a Latent Reasoner](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.03206/) (2025)
- [LaDiR: Latent Diffusion Enhances LLMs for Text Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.04573/) (2025)
- [SwiReasoning: Switch-Thinking in Latent and Explicit for Pareto-Superior Reasoning LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.05069/) (2025)
- [The Geometry of Reasoning: Flowing Logics in Representation Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.09782/) (2025)
- [Generative Recursive Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.19376/) (2026)
- [Probabilistic Tiny Recursive Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.19943/) (2026)
- [Emergence of Superposition: Unveiling the Training Dynamics of Chain of Continuous Thought](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.23365/) (2025)
- [Soft-Masked Diffusion Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.17206/) (2025)
- [Multiplex Thinking: Reasoning via Token-wise Branch-and-Merge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.08808/) (2026)
- [A Formal Comparison Between Chain of Thought and Latent Thought](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.25239/) (2025)
- [SynAdapt: Learning Adaptive Reasoning in Large Language Models via Synthetic Continuous Chain-of-Thought](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.00574/) (2025)
- [The Debate on RLVR Reasoning Capability Boundary: Shrinkage, Expansion, or Both? A Two-Stage Dynamic View](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.04028/) (2025)
- [Solve the Loop: Attractor Models for Language and Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.12466/) (2026)
- [Depth-Recurrent Attention Mixtures: Giving Latent Reasoning the Attention it Deserves](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.21582/) (2026)
- [Do Latent-CoT Models Think Step-by-Step? A Mechanistic Study on Sequential Reasoning Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.00449/) (2026)
- [Dynamics Within Latent Chain-of-Thought: An Empirical Study of Causal Structure](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.08783/) (2026)
- [ReGuLaR: Variational Latent Reasoning Guided by Rendered Chain-of-Thought](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.23184/) (2026)
- [How Do Latent Reasoning Methods Perform Under Weak and Strong Supervision?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.22441/) (2026)
- [The Vision Wormhole: Latent-Space Communication in Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.15382/) (2026)
- [ThinkRouter: Efficient Reasoning via Routing Thinking between Latent and Discrete Spaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.11683/) (2026)
- [MobileLLM-R1: Exploring the Limits of Sub-Billion Language Model Reasoners with Open Training Recipes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.24945/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance in many applications, including challenging reasoning problems via chain-of-thoughts (CoTs) techniques that generate ``thinking tokens'' before answering the questions. While existing theoretical works demonstrate that CoTs with discrete tokens boost the capability of LLMs, recent work on continuous CoTs lacks a theoretical understanding of why it outperforms discrete counterparts in various reasoning tasks such as directed graph reachability, a fundamental graph reasoning problem that includes many practical domain applications as special cases. In this paper, we prove that a two-layer transformer with D steps of continuous CoTs can solve the directed graph reachability problem, where D is the diameter of the graph, while the best known result of constant-depth transformers with discrete CoTs requires O(n2) decoding steps where n is the number of vertices (D<n). In our construction, each continuous thought vector is a superposition state that encodes multiple search frontiers simultaneously (i.e., parallel breadth-first search (BFS)), while discrete CoTs must choose a single path sampled from the superposition state, which leads to sequential search that requires many more steps and may be trapped into local solutions. We also performed extensive experiments to verify that our theoretical construction aligns well with the empirical solution obtained via training dynamics. Notably, encoding of multiple search frontiers as a superposition state automatically emerges in training continuous CoTs, without explicit supervision to guide the model to explore multiple paths simultaneously.
