# PANORAMA: A synthetic PII-laced dataset for studying sensitive data memorization in LLMs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.12238 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.12238/

## Key facts

- Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 19 of its 28 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 May 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [GPT-4o System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21276/) (2024)
- [Pointer Sentinel Mixture Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.07843/) (2016)
- [The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.00027/) (2020)
- [Extracting Training Data from Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.07805/) (2020)
- [Membership Inference Attacks From First Principles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.03570/) (2021)
- [Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.07646/) (2022)
- [Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Better](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.06499/) (2021)
- [Phi-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.08905/) (2024)
- [Scalable Extraction of Training Data from (Production) Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.17035/) (2023)
- [Memorization Without Overfitting: Analyzing the Training Dynamics of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.10770/) (2022)
- [When Machine Unlearning Jeopardizes Privacy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.02205/) (2020)
- [RedPajama: an Open Dataset for Training Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.12372/) (2024)
- [The Privacy Onion Effect: Memorization is Relative](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.10469/) (2022)
- [Inexact Unlearning Needs More Careful Evaluations to Avoid a False Sense of Privacy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.01218/) (2024)
- [Be like a Goldfish, Don't Memorize! Mitigating Memorization in Generative LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.10209/) (2024)
- [LLM-PBE: Assessing Data Privacy in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.12787/) (2024)
- [A Synthetic Dataset for Personal Attribute Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.07217/) (2024)
- [Quantifying Association Capabilities of Large Language Models and Its Implications on Privacy Leakage](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12707/) (2023)
- [PII-Scope: A Comprehensive Study on Training Data PII Extraction Attacks in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.06704/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Privasis: Synthesizing the Largest "Public" Private Dataset from Scratch](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.03183/) (2026)
- [WebPII: Benchmarking Visual PII Detection for Computer-Use Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.17357/) (2026)
- [LACUNA: A Testbed for Evaluating Localization Precision for LLM Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.02513/) (2026)
- [Subject-level Inference for Realistic Text Anonymization Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.21211/) (2026)
- [Phantoms and Disclosures: A Statistical Framework for Auditing Privacy in Synthetic Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.16952/) (2026)
- [ProfileFoundry: A Synthetic Person-Object Substrate for Privacy, Memory, and Tool-Use Evaluation in LLM Agent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.26403/) (2026)
- [PANOPTICON: A PII-Based Assemblage of Naturalistic Output Tokens for Investigating Privacy Leakage Within LLM Context Window](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.22695/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The memorization of sensitive and personally identifiable information (PII) by large language models (LLMs) poses growing privacy risks as models scale and are increasingly deployed in real-world applications. Existing efforts to study sensitive and PII data memorization and develop mitigation strategies are hampered by the absence of comprehensive, realistic, and ethically sourced datasets reflecting the diversity of sensitive information found on the web. We introduce PANORAMA - Profile-based Assemblage for Naturalistic Online Representation and Attribute Memorization Analysis, a large-scale synthetic corpus of 384,789 samples derived from 9,674 synthetic profiles designed to closely emulate the distribution, variety, and context of PII and sensitive data as it naturally occurs in online environments. Our data generation pipeline begins with the construction of internally consistent, multi-attribute human profiles using constrained selection to reflect real-world demographics such as education, health attributes, financial status, etc. Using a combination of zero-shot prompting and OpenAI o3-mini, we generate diverse content types - including wiki-style articles, social media posts, forum discussions, online reviews, comments, and marketplace listings - each embedding realistic, contextually appropriate PII and other sensitive information. We validate the utility of PANORAMA by fine-tuning the Mistral-7B model on 1x, 5x, 10x, and 25x data replication rates with a subset of data and measure PII memorization rates - revealing not only consistent increases with repetition but also variation across content types, highlighting PANORAMA's ability to model how memorization risks differ by context. Our dataset and code are publicly available, providing a much-needed resource for privacy risk assessment, model auditing, and the development of privacy-preserving LLMs.
