# Enhancing Code Quality with Generative AI: Boosting Developer Warning Compliance

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.11677 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.11677/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 1 of its 14 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 16 May 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Programmers have long ignored warnings, especially those generated by static analysis tools, due to the potential for false-positives. In some cases, warnings may be indicative of larger issues, but programmers may not understand how a seemingly unimportant warning can grow into a vulnerability. Because these messages tend to be long and confusing, programmers tend to ignore them if they do not cause readily identifiable issues. Large language models can simplify these warnings, explain the gravity of important warnings, and suggest potential fixes to increase developer compliance with fixing warnings.