# Comparing LLM Text Annotation Skills: A Study on Human Rights Violations in Social Media Data

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.10260 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.10260/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 11 of its 25 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 May 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07258/) (2021)
- [Improving Reproducibility in Machine Learning Research (A Report from the NeurIPS 2019 Reproducibility Program)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.12206/) (2020)
- [ChatGPT-4 Outperforms Experts and Crowd Workers in Annotating Political Twitter Messages with Zero-Shot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.06588/) (2023)
- [CoAnnotating: Uncertainty-Guided Work Allocation between Human and Large Language Models for Data Annotation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.15638/) (2023)
- [LLMs Accelerate Annotation for Medical Information Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.02296/) (2023)
- [Automated Annotation with Generative AI Requires Validation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00176/) (2023)
- [Unlocking Practical Applications in Legal Domain: Evaluation of GPT for Zero-Shot Semantic Annotation of Legal Texts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.04417/) (2023)
- [ALLURE: Auditing and Improving LLM-based Evaluation of Text using Iterative In-Context-Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.13701/) (2023)
- [Human Still Wins over LLM: An Empirical Study of Active Learning on Domain-Specific Annotation Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09825/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [UDHRBench: Benchmarking Human Rights in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.15179/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In the era of increasingly sophisticated natural language processing (NLP) systems, large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential for diverse applications, including tasks requiring nuanced textual understanding and contextual reasoning. This study investigates the capabilities of multiple state-of-the-art LLMs - GPT-3.5, GPT-4, LLAMA3, Mistral 7B, and Claude-2 - for zero-shot and few-shot annotation of a complex textual dataset comprising social media posts in Russian and Ukrainian. Specifically, the focus is on the binary classification task of identifying references to human rights violations within the dataset. To evaluate the effectiveness of these models, their annotations are compared against a gold standard set of human double-annotated labels across 1000 samples. The analysis includes assessing annotation performance under different prompting conditions, with prompts provided in both English and Russian. Additionally, the study explores the unique patterns of errors and disagreements exhibited by each model, offering insights into their strengths, limitations, and cross-linguistic adaptability. By juxtaposing LLM outputs with human annotations, this research contributes to understanding the reliability and applicability of LLMs for sensitive, domain-specific tasks in multilingual contexts. It also sheds light on how language models handle inherently subjective and context-dependent judgments, a critical consideration for their deployment in real-world scenarios.