# Zero-Shot Multi-modal Large Language Model v.s. Supervised Deep Learning: A Comparative Study on CT-Based Intracranial Hemorrhage Subtyping

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.09252 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09252/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Medical vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 11 of its 51 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 May 2025.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Medical vision-language models](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/medical-vision-language-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16502/) (2023)
- [A Systematic Survey of Prompt Engineering in Large Language Models: Techniques and Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.07927/) (2024)
- [BiomedGPT: A Generalist Vision-Language Foundation Model for Diverse Biomedical Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17100/) (2023)
- [EndoChat: Grounded Multimodal Large Language Model for Endoscopic Surgery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.11347/) (2025)
- [Medical Adaptation of Large Language and Vision-Language Models: Are We Making Progress?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.04118/) (2024)
- [BHSD: A 3D Multi-Class Brain Hemorrhage Segmentation Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.11298/) (2023)
- [GMAI-VL & GMAI-VL-5.5M: A Large Vision-Language Model and A Comprehensive Multimodal Dataset Towards General Medical AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.14522/) (2024)
- [E3D-GPT: Enhanced 3D Visual Foundation for Medical Vision-Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.14200/) (2024)
- [SAMIHS: Adaptation of Segment Anything Model for Intracranial Hemorrhage Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.08190/) (2023)
- [Semi-supervised learning for generalizable intracranial hemorrhage detection and segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.00582/) (2021)
- [Improving Automated Hemorrhage Detection in Sparse-view Computed Tomography via Deep Convolutional Neural Network based Artifact Reduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.09340/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [NeuroVLM-Bench: Evaluation of Vision-Enabled Large Language Models for Clinical Reasoning in Neurological Disorders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.24846/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Introduction: Timely identification of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) subtypes on non-contrast computed tomography is critical for prognosis prediction and therapeutic decision-making, yet remains challenging due to low contrast and blurring boundaries. This study evaluates the performance of zero-shot multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) compared to traditional deep learning methods in ICH binary classification and subtyping. Methods: We utilized a dataset provided by RSNA, comprising 192 NCCT volumes. The study compares various MLLMs, including GPT-4o, Gemini 2.0 Flash, and Claude 3.5 Sonnet V2, with conventional deep learning models, including ResNet50 and Vision Transformer. Carefully crafted prompts were used to guide MLLMs in tasks such as ICH presence, subtype classification, localization, and volume estimation. Results: The results indicate that in the ICH binary classification task, traditional deep learning models outperform MLLMs comprehensively. For subtype classification, MLLMs also exhibit inferior performance compared to traditional deep learning models, with Gemini 2.0 Flash achieving an macro-averaged precision of 0.41 and a macro-averaged F1 score of 0.31. Conclusion: While MLLMs excel in interactive capabilities, their overall accuracy in ICH subtyping is inferior to deep networks. However, MLLMs enhance interpretability through language interactions, indicating potential in medical imaging analysis. Future efforts will focus on model refinement and developing more precise MLLMs to improve performance in three-dimensional medical image processing.
