# How Do Companies Manage the Environmental Sustainability of AI? An Interview Study About Green AI Efforts and Regulations

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.07317 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.07317/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 55 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 12 May 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Green AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.10597/) (2019)
- [Carbon Emissions and Large Neural Network Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.10350/) (2021)
- [Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.09700/) (2019)
- [Estimating the Carbon Footprint of BLOOM, a 176B Parameter Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.02001/) (2022)
- [Towards the Systematic Reporting of the Energy and Carbon Footprints of Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.05651/) (2020)
- [Sustainable AI: Environmental Implications, Challenges and Opportunities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.00364/) (2021)
- [Power Hungry Processing: Watts Driving the Cost of AI Deployment?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16863/) (2023)
- [Designing Energy-Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks using Energy-Aware Pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.05128/) (2016)
- [Measuring the Carbon Intensity of AI in Cloud Instances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.05229/) (2022)
- [A Systematic Review of Green AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.11047/) (2023)
- [LLMCarbon: Modeling the end-to-end Carbon Footprint of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.14393/) (2023)
- [Eco2AI: carbon emissions tracking of machine learning models as the first step towards sustainable AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.00406/) (2022)
- [Sampling in Software Engineering Research: A Critical Review and Guidelines](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.07764/) (2020)
- [A Synthesis of Green Architectural Tactics for ML-Enabled Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.09610/) (2023)
- [Uncovering Energy-Efficient Practices in Deep Learning Training: Preliminary Steps Towards Green AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.13972/) (2023)
- [Toward Sustainable GenAI using Generation Directives for Carbon-Friendly Large Language Model Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.12900/) (2024)
- [A Dempster-Shafer approach to trustworthy AI with application to fetal brain MRI segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02779/) (2022)
- [A Controlled Experiment on the Energy Efficiency of the Source Code Generated by Code Llama](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.03616/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Metrics and evaluations for computational and sustainable AI efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.17885/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

With the ever-growing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI), AI-based software and its negative impact on the environment are no longer negligible, and studying and mitigating this impact has become a critical area of research. However, it is currently unclear which role environmental sustainability plays during AI adoption in industry and how AI regulations influence Green AI practices and decision-making in industry. We therefore aim to investigate the Green AI perception and management of industry practitioners. To this end, we conducted a total of 11 interviews with participants from 10 different organizations that adopted AI-based software. The interviews explored three main themes: AI adoption, current efforts in mitigating the negative environmental impact of AI, and the influence of the EU AI Act and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). Our findings indicate that 9 of 11 participants prioritized business efficiency during AI adoption, with minimal consideration of environmental sustainability. Monitoring and mitigation of AI's environmental impact were very limited. Only one participant monitored negative environmental effects. Regarding applied mitigation practices, six participants reported no actions, with the others sporadically mentioning techniques like prompt engineering, relying on smaller models, or not overusing AI. Awareness and compliance with the EU AI Act are low, with only one participant reporting on its influence, while the CSRD drove sustainability reporting efforts primarily in larger companies. All in all, our findings reflect a lack of urgency and priority for sustainable AI among these companies. We suggest that current regulations are not very effective, which has implications for policymakers. Additionally, there is a need to raise industry awareness, but also to provide user-friendly techniques and tools for Green AI practices.