# Harnessing LLMs Explanations to Boost Surrogate Models in Tabular Data Classification

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.05744 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.05744/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 24 of its 36 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 May 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.02754/) (2016)
- [Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.07682/) (2022)
- [Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.13586/) (2021)
- [Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.11959/) (2021)
- [Automatic Chain of Thought Prompting in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03493/) (2022)
- [TabPFN: A Transformer That Solves Small Tabular Classification Problems in a Second](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.01848/) (2022)
- [TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.07442/) (2019)
- [Self-Normalizing Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.02515/) (2017)
- [TabTransformer: Tabular Data Modeling Using Contextual Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.06678/) (2020)
- [DCN V2: Improved Deep & Cross Network and Practical Lessons for Web-scale Learning to Rank Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.13535/) (2020)
- [AutoInt: Automatic Feature Interaction Learning via Self-Attentive Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.11921/) (2018)
- [SAINT: Improved Neural Networks for Tabular Data via Row Attention and Contrastive Pre-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.01342/) (2021)
- [Neural Oblivious Decision Ensembles for Deep Learning on Tabular Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.06312/) (2019)
- [SCARF: Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning using Random Feature Corruption](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.15147/) (2021)
- [Well-tuned Simple Nets Excel on Tabular Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.11189/) (2021)
- [LIFT: Language-Interfaced Fine-Tuning for Non-Language Machine Learning Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.06565/) (2022)
- [Automated Repair of Programs from Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.10583/) (2022)
- [STUNT: Few-shot Tabular Learning with Self-generated Tasks from Unlabeled Tables](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.00918/) (2023)
- [Gradient Boosting Neural Networks: GrowNet](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.07971/) (2020)
- [TABLET: Learning From Instructions For Tabular Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.13188/) (2023)
- [ReConTab: Regularized Contrastive Representation Learning for Tabular Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.18541/) (2023)
- [Leveraging Large Language Models for Automated Dialogue Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06490/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable ability in solving complex tasks, making them a promising tool for enhancing tabular learning. However, existing LLM-based methods suffer from high resource requirements, suboptimal demonstration selection, and limited interpretability, which largely hinder their prediction performance and application in the real world. To overcome these problems, we propose a novel in-context learning framework for tabular prediction. The core idea is to leverage the explanations generated by LLMs to guide a smaller, locally deployable Surrogate Language Model (SLM) to make interpretable tabular predictions. Specifically, our framework mainly involves three stages: (i) Post Hoc Explanation Generation, where LLMs are utilized to generate explanations for question-answer pairs in candidate demonstrations, providing insights into the reasoning behind the answer. (ii) Post Hoc Explanation-Guided Demonstrations Selection, which utilizes explanations generated by LLMs to guide the process of demonstration selection from candidate demonstrations. (iii) Post Hoc Explanation-Guided Interpretable SLM Prediction, which utilizes the demonstrations obtained in step (ii) as in-context and merges corresponding explanations as rationales to improve the performance of SLM and guide the model to generate interpretable outputs. Experimental results highlight the framework's effectiveness, with an average accuracy improvement of 5.31% across various tabular datasets in diverse domains.