# Not Like Us, Hunty: Measuring Perceptions and Behavioral Effects of Minoritized Anthropomorphic Cues in LLMs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.05660 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.05660/

## Key facts

- Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 8 May 2025.

## Built on by (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Taxonomy of User Needs and Actions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.06124/) (2025)
- [Anthropomimetic Uncertainty: What Verbalized Uncertainty in Language Models is Missing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.10587/) (2025)
- [DoubleAgents: Human-Agent Alignment in a Socially Embedded Workflow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.12626/) (2025)
- [SLAyiNG: A Diverse and Community-validated Dataset of Queer Slang](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.17449/) (2025)
- [Designing Beyond Language: Sociotechnical Barriers in AI Health Technologies for Limited English Proficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.07277/) (2025)
- [When AI Writes, Whose Voice Remains? Quantifying Cultural Marker Erasure Across World English Varieties in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.22145/) (2026)
- [Side-by-side Comparison Amplifies Dialect Bias in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.24384/) (2026)
- [Ouvia: A User-centered Framework for Measuring Usability of Speech Translation in Real-World Communication Scenarios](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.06177/) (2026)
- [Do Language Models Know Their Slang? Queer Slang Understanding in User-Generated Content](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.04847/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

As large language models (LLMs) increasingly adapt and personalize to diverse sets of users, there is an increased risk of systems appropriating sociolects, i.e., language styles or dialects that are associated with specific minoritized lived experiences (e.g., African American English, Queer slang). In this work, we examine whether sociolect usage by an LLM agent affects user reliance on its outputs and user perception (satisfaction, frustration, trust, and social presence). We designed and conducted user studies where 498 African American English (AAE) speakers and 487 Queer slang speakers performed a set of question-answering tasks with LLM-based suggestions in either standard American English (SAE) or their self-identified sociolect. Our findings showed that sociolect usage by LLMs influenced both reliance and perceptions, though in some surprising ways. Results suggest that both AAE and Queer slang speakers relied more on the SAE agent, and had more positive perceptions of the SAE agent. Yet, only Queer slang speakers felt more social presence from the Queer slang agent over the SAE one, whereas only AAE speakers preferred and trusted the SAE agent over the AAE one. These findings emphasize the need to test for behavioral outcomes rather than simply assume that personalization would lead to a better and safer reliance outcome. They also highlight the nuanced dynamics of minoritized language in machine interactions, underscoring the need for LLMs to be carefully designed to respect cultural and linguistic boundaries while fostering genuine user engagement and trust.