# SITE: towards Spatial Intelligence Thorough Evaluation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.05456 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.05456/

## Key facts

- Cited by 29 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 62 of its 91 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 May 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 62)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [Qwen2.5 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15115/) (2024)
- [Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.05530/) (2024)
- [ScanNet: Richly-annotated 3D Reconstructions of Indoor Scenes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.04405/) (2017)
- [RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15818/) (2023)
- [OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.09246/) (2024)
- [LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03326/) (2024)
- [InternVL: Scaling up Vision Foundation Models and Aligning for Generic Visual-Linguistic Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.14238/) (2023)
- [VQA: Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.00468/) (2015)
- [MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.06281/) (2023)
- [Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phone](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.14219/) (2024)
- [MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13394/) (2023)
- [Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.12213/) (2024)
- [CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.06890/) (2016)
- [Video-MME: The First-Ever Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark of Multi-modal LLMs in Video Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.21075/) (2024)
- [LIBERO: Benchmarking Knowledge Transfer for Lifelong Robot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03310/) (2023)
- [BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.04687/) (2018)
- [MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.02490/) (2023)
- [OK-VQA: A Visual Question Answering Benchmark Requiring External Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.00067/) (2019)
- [MVBench: A Comprehensive Multi-modal Video Understanding Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.17005/) (2023)
- [Modeling Context in Referring Expressions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.00272/) (2016)
- [Vision-and-Language Navigation: Interpreting visually-grounded navigation instructions in real environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.07280/) (2017)
- [SEED-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal LLMs with Generative Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16125/) (2023)
- [Generation and Comprehension of Unambiguous Object Descriptions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.02283/) (2015)
- [Cambrian-1: A Fully Open, Vision-Centric Exploration of Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.16860/) (2024)
- [Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06209/) (2024)
- [Thinking in Space: How Multimodal Large Language Models See, Remember, and Recall Spaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14171/) (2024)
- [ActivityNet-QA: A Dataset for Understanding Complex Web Videos via Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02467/) (2019)

## Built on by (most cited first, 29 of 29)

- [Spatial Forcing: Implicit Spatial Representation Alignment for Vision-language-action Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.12276/) (2025)
- [Scaling Spatial Intelligence with Multimodal Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.13719/) (2025)
- [How Far are VLMs from Visual Spatial Intelligence? A Benchmark-Driven Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.18905/) (2025)
- [Holistic Evaluation of Multimodal LLMs on Spatial Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.13142/) (2025)
- [SpatialScore: Towards Comprehensive Evaluation for Spatial Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.17012/) (2025)
- [Mull-Tokens: Modality-Agnostic Latent Thinking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.10941/) (2025)
- [Thinking with Geometry: Active Geometry Integration for Spatial Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.06037/) (2026)
- [HY-Embodied-0.5: Embodied Foundation Models for Real-World Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.07430/) (2026)
- [SpatialTree: How Spatial Abilities Branch Out in MLLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.20617/) (2025)
- [From Pixels to Words -- Towards Native One-Vision Models at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.28820/) (2026)
- [Hy-Embodied-VLM-1.0: Efficient Physical-World Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.12894/) (2026)
- [Mind Meets Space: Rethinking Agentic Spatial Intelligence from a Neuroscience-inspired Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.09154/) (2025)
- [Boosting MLLM Spatial Reasoning with Geometrically Referenced 3D Scene Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.08592/) (2026)
- [World2VLM: Distilling World Model Imagination into VLMs for Dynamic Spatial Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.26934/) (2026)
- [MultiView-Bench: A Diagnostic Benchmark for World-Centric Multi-View Integration in VLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.08970/) (2026)
- [Are VLMs Lost Between Sky and Space? LinkS2Bench for UAV-Satellite Dynamic Cross-View Spatial Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.02020/) (2026)
- [Stepping VLMs onto the Court: Benchmarking Spatial Intelligence in Sports](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.09896/) (2026)
- [SpaceMind++: Toward Allocentric Cognitive Maps for Spatially Grounded Video MLLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.09449/) (2026)
- [SpatialAct: Probing Spatial Reasoning-to-Action Capabilities of VLM Agents in 3D Scenes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.31148/) (2026)
- [ME-VLM: A Unified VLM for Embodied Cognition and Agent Coordination](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.24526/) (2026)
- [PinpointQA: A Benchmark for Small Object-Centric Spatial Understanding in Indoor Videos](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.08991/) (2026)
- [Eliciting Complex Spatial Reasoning in MLLMs through Wide-Baseline Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.03577/) (2026)
- [OrientSAM: Mitigating Camera-Centric Shortcut in Multimodal Spatial Reasoning via Orientation-Aware Spatial Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.17657/) (2026)
- [ChainSpace: A Chained-Reasoning Paradigm for Spatial Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.15788/) (2026)
- [Space as an Interventional Invariant: Cross-Modal Predictive Geometry for Stratified Cities and Em-Spaced Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.11959/) (2026)
- [Metric-Bench: Exploring In-context Spatial Metric Reasoning in VLMs for Indoor Scenes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.25841/) (2026)
- [SpatialASM: Internalizing Active Mentalization for Spatial Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.13832/) (2026)
- [GeoThinker-F: Endogenous Predictive World Representations for Fast Spatial Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.20592/) (2026)
- [DynThinker: Unifying Static 3D and Dynamic 4D Spatial Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.20598/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Spatial intelligence (SI) represents a cognitive ability encompassing the visualization, manipulation, and reasoning about spatial relationships, underpinning disciplines from neuroscience to robotics. We introduce SITE, a benchmark dataset towards SI Thorough Evaluation in a standardized format of multi-choice visual question-answering, designed to assess large vision-language models' spatial intelligence across diverse visual modalities (single-image, multi-image, and video) and SI factors (figural to environmental scales, spatial visualization and orientation, intrinsic and extrinsic, static and dynamic). Our approach to curating the benchmark combines a bottom-up survey about 31 existing datasets and a top-down strategy drawing upon three classification systems in cognitive science, which prompt us to design two novel types of tasks about view-taking and dynamic scenes. Extensive experiments reveal that leading models fall behind human experts especially in spatial orientation, a fundamental SI factor. Moreover, we demonstrate a positive correlation between a model's spatial reasoning proficiency and its performance on an embodied AI task.