# Software Development Life Cycle Perspective: A Survey of Benchmarks for Code Large Language Models and Agents

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.05283 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.05283/

## Key facts

- Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 92 of its 210 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 May 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Software engineering coding agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/software-engineering-coding-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 92)

- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Program Synthesis with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07732/) (2021)
- [SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06770/) (2023)
- [Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15043/) (2023)
- [A Survey of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.18223/) (2023)
- [LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.07974/) (2024)
- [Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12186/) (2024)
- [DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming -- The Rise of Code Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.14196/) (2024)
- [Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Task](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.08887/) (2018)
- [Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPS](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.09938/) (2021)
- [CodeXGLUE: A Machine Learning Benchmark Dataset for Code Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.04664/) (2021)
- [Seq2SQL: Generating Structured Queries from Natural Language using Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.00103/) (2017)
- [CodeSearchNet Challenge: Evaluating the State of Semantic Code Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.09436/) (2019)
- [BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.15877/) (2024)
- [RepoCoder: Repository-Level Code Completion Through Iterative Retrieval and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.12570/) (2023)
- [MLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning Experimentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03302/) (2023)
- [RepoBench: Benchmarking Repository-Level Code Auto-Completion Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03091/) (2023)
- [CodeGeeX: A Pre-Trained Model for Code Generation with Multilingual Benchmarking on HumanEval-X](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17568/) (2023)
- [CRUXEval: A Benchmark for Code Reasoning, Understanding and Execution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.03065/) (2024)
- [CodeAgent: Enhancing Code Generation with Tool-Integrated Agent Systems for Real-World Repo-level Coding Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.07339/) (2024)
- [OpenCodeInterpreter: Integrating Code Generation with Execution and Refinement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14658/) (2024)
- [CodeNet: A Large-Scale AI for Code Dataset for Learning a Diversity of Coding Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.12655/) (2021)
- [Don't Make Your LLM an Evaluation Benchmark Cheater](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.01964/) (2023)
- [OctoPack: Instruction Tuning Code Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.07124/) (2023)
- [CoSQL: A Conversational Text-to-SQL Challenge Towards Cross-Domain Natural Language Interfaces to Databases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.05378/) (2019)
- [ClassEval: A Manually-Crafted Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Class-level Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.01861/) (2023)
- [Multi-lingual Evaluation of Code Generation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.14868/) (2022)
- [Design2Code: Benchmarking Multimodal Code Generation for Automated Front-End Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03163/) (2024)
- [SParC: Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02285/) (2019)
- [Vulnerability Detection with Code Language Models: How Far Are We?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.18624/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [World of Workflows: A Benchmark for Bringing World Models to Enterprise Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.22130/) (2026)
- [FreshBrew: A Benchmark for Evaluating AI Agents on Java Code Migration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.04852/) (2025)
- [CIBER: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Security Evaluation of Code Interpreter Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.19547/) (2026)
- [LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems for Code Generation: A Multi-Vocal Literature Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.16321/) (2026)
- [ScaleWoB: Guiding GUI Agents with Coding Agents via Large-Scale Environmental Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.25160/) (2026)
- [CodeChemist: Test-Time Scaling for Low-Resource Code Generation via Functional Knowledge Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.00501/) (2025)
- [Benchmarking Large Language Models for ABAP Code Generation: An Empirical Study on Iterative Improvement by Compiler Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.15188/) (2026)
- [Are AI Coders Snitches? An Empirical Study of Pretraining Data Detection on Code Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.17389/) (2025)
- [Schedule-and-Calibrate: Utility-Guided Multi-Task Reinforcement Learning for Code LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.06111/) (2026)
- [Beyond the Autoregressive Horizon: A Comprehensive Survey of Diffusion Models, World Modelling, and State Space Models for Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.23690/) (2026)
- [A Lean and Spec-Driven AI-Assisted Software Development Lifecycle for Applied AI Education: The AI-SDLC Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.24348/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Code large language models (CodeLLMs) and agents are increasingly being integrated into complex software engineering tasks spanning the entire Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC). Benchmarking is critical for rigorously evaluating these capabilities. However, despite their growing significance, there remains a lack of comprehensive reviews that examine these benchmarks from an SDLC perspective. To bridge this gap, we propose a tiered analysis framework to systematically review 178 benchmarks from 461 papers, comprehensively characterizing them from the perspective of the SDLC. Our findings reveal a notable imbalance in the coverage of current benchmarks, with approximately 61% focused on the software implementation phase in SDLC, while requirements engineering and software design phases receive minimal attention at only 5% and 3%, respectively. % Additionally, anti-contamination strategies are largely absent from current benchmarks, leading to an increased risk of data leakage. Furthermore, current benchmarks lack effective anti-contamination strategies, posing significant risks of data leakage and potentially inflated performance assessments. Finally, we identify key open challenges in current research and outline future directions to narrow the gap between the theoretical capabilities of CodeLLMs and agents and their practical effectiveness in real-world scenarios.