# Graph Drawing for LLMs: An Empirical Evaluation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.03678 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.03678/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 17 of its 35 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 May 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [GPT-4o System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21276/) (2024)
- [A Survey of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.18223/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.05232/) (2023)
- [A Systematic Survey of Prompt Engineering in Large Language Models: Techniques and Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.07927/) (2024)
- [LiveBench: A Challenging, Contamination-Limited LLM Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.19314/) (2024)
- [GraphGPT: Graph Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.13023/) (2023)
- [GPT4Graph: Can Large Language Models Understand Graph Structured Data ? An Empirical Evaluation and Benchmarking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15066/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models on Graphs: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.02783/) (2023)
- [Talk like a Graph: Encoding Graphs for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.04560/) (2023)
- [Graph Learning: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.00696/) (2021)
- [GraphLLM: Boosting Graph Reasoning Ability of Large Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.05845/) (2023)
- [A Survey of Large Language Models for Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.08011/) (2024)
- [GraphInstruct: Empowering Large Language Models with Graph Understanding and Reasoning Capability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.04483/) (2024)
- [GITA: Graph to Visual and Textual Integration for Vision-Language Graph Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.02130/) (2024)
- [Which Modality should I use -- Text, Motif, or Image? : Understanding Graphs with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09862/) (2023)
- [Edge-Path Bundling: A Less Ambiguous Edge Bundling Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.05467/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Graph2Counsel: Clinically Grounded Synthetic Counseling Dialogue Generation from Client Psychological Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.20382/) (2026)
- [RepoAtlas: Guiding Coding Agents via Evolving Multimodal Repository Views](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.16936/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Our work contributes to the fast-growing literature on the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) to perform graph-related tasks. In particular, we focus on usage scenarios that rely on the visual modality, feeding the model with a drawing of the graph under analysis. We investigate how the model's performance is affected by the chosen layout paradigm, the aesthetics of the drawing, and the prompting technique used for the queries. We formulate three corresponding research questions and present the results of a thorough experimental analysis. Our findings reveal that choosing the right layout paradigm and optimizing the readability of the input drawing from a human perspective can significantly improve the performance of the model on the given task. Moreover, selecting the most effective prompting technique is a challenging yet crucial task for achieving optimal performance.
