# Sentient Agent as a Judge: Evaluating Higher-Order Social Cognition in Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.02847 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.02847/

## Key facts

- Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 56 of its 75 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 May 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Social simulation and multi-agent debate](https://mlsanity.com/agents/social-simulation-and-multi-agent-debate/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 56)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11366/) (2023)
- [Let's Verify Step by Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20050/) (2023)
- [Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.04132/) (2024)
- [WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.12244/) (2023)
- [Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.19118/) (2023)
- [Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.08935/) (2023)
- [AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14387/) (2023)
- [ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.07201/) (2023)
- [RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.00267/) (2023)
- [Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.01335/) (2024)
- [Orca: Progressive Learning from Complex Explanation Traces of GPT-4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.02707/) (2023)
- [SOTOPIA: Interactive Evaluation for Social Intelligence in Language Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.11667/) (2023)
- [JudgeLM: Fine-tuned Large Language Models are Scalable Judges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.17631/) (2023)
- [PandaLM: An Automatic Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Instruction Tuning Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05087/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models are Effective Text Rankers with Pairwise Ranking Prompting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.17563/) (2023)
- [Towards Emotional Support Dialog Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.01144/) (2021)
- [Agent-as-a-Judge: Evaluate Agents with Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.10934/) (2024)
- [Neural Theory-of-Mind? On the Limits of Social Intelligence in Large LMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.13312/) (2022)
- [V-STaR: Training Verifiers for Self-Taught Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.06457/) (2024)
- [Meta-Rewarding Language Models: Self-Improving Alignment with LLM-as-a-Meta-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.19594/) (2024)
- [InCharacter: Evaluating Personality Fidelity in Role-Playing Agents through Psychological Interviews](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.17976/) (2023)
- [FANToM: A Benchmark for Stress-testing Machine Theory of Mind in Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.15421/) (2023)
- [Clever Hans or Neural Theory of Mind? Stress Testing Social Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14763/) (2023)
- [Aligning with Human Judgement: The Role of Pairwise Preference in Large Language Model Evaluators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.16950/) (2024)
- [CharacterEval: A Chinese Benchmark for Role-Playing Conversational Agent Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.01275/) (2024)
- [InFoBench: Evaluating Instruction Following Ability in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.03601/) (2024)
- [Branch-Solve-Merge Improves Large Language Model Evaluation and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.15123/) (2023)
- [On scalable oversight with weak LLMs judging strong LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.04622/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [RLVER: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Emotion Rewards for Empathetic Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.03112/) (2025)
- [Agent-as-a-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.05111/) (2026)
- [Too Good to be Bad: On the Failure of LLMs to Role-Play Villains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.04962/) (2025)
- [Reward Modeling from Natural Language Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.07349/) (2026)
- [Generate, Filter, Control, Replay: A Comprehensive Survey of Rollout Strategies for LLM Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.02913/) (2026)
- [Enhancing Large Language Model Reasoning with Reward Models: An Analytical Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.01925/) (2025)
- [RecGPT-V2 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.14503/) (2025)
- [Think Fast and Slow: Step-Level Cognitive Depth Adaptation for LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.12662/) (2026)
- [EMPA: Evaluating Persona-Aligned Empathy as a Process](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.00552/) (2026)
- [MICA: Multi-granularity Intertemporal Credit Assignment for Long-Horizon Emotional Support Dialogue](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.06194/) (2026)
- [EIBench: A Simulator-Based Benchmark and Turn-Credit RL for Emotion Management](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.15532/) (2026)
- [PEER: Unified Process-Outcome Reinforcement Learning for Structured Empathetic Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.09521/) (2025)
- [VLM-Guided Group Preference Alignment for Diffusion-based Human Mesh Recovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.19180/) (2026)
- [COGTRL: Training LLMs for Scientific Discovery Assistance using Cognitive Traces via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.30109/) (2026)
- [Can You Break RLVER? Probing Adversarial Robustness of RL-Trained Empathetic Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.07138/) (2026)
- [User-Aware Active Knowledge Acquisition for Emotional Support Dialogue](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.29715/) (2026)
- [The Periodic Table of LLM Reasoning: A Structured Survey of Reasoning Paradigms, Methods, and Failure Modes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.11470/) (2026)
- [Towards High-Level Semantic Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.24082/) (2026)
- [R3-Bench: LLMs Struggle with Resource-Rational Reasoning under Shared Budgets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.16033/) (2026)
- [TRACER: Trajectory-Aligned Learning for Multi-Turn User Simulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.28690/) (2026)
- [Evolving Support Priorities in Empathetic Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.34249/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Assessing how well a large language model (LLM) understands human, rather than merely text, remains an open challenge. To bridge the gap, we introduce Sentient Agent as a Judge (SAGE), an automated evaluation framework that measures an LLM's higher-order social cognition. SAGE instantiates a Sentient Agent that simulates human-like emotional changes and inner thoughts during interaction, providing a more realistic evaluation of the tested model in multi-turn conversations. At every turn, the agent reasons about (i) how its emotion changes, (ii) how it feels, and (iii) how it should reply, yielding a numerical emotion trajectory and interpretable inner thoughts. Experiments on 100 supportive-dialogue scenarios show that the final Sentient emotion score correlates strongly with Barrett-Lennard Relationship Inventory (BLRI) ratings and utterance-level empathy metrics, validating psychological fidelity. We also build a public Sentient Leaderboard covering 18 commercial and open-source models that uncovers substantial gaps (up to 4x) between frontier systems (GPT-4o-Latest, Gemini2.5-Pro) and earlier baselines, gaps not reflected in conventional leaderboards (e.g., Arena). SAGE thus provides a principled, scalable and interpretable tool for tracking progress toward genuinely empathetic and socially adept language agents.