# AutoLibra: Agent Metric Induction from Open-Ended Human Feedback

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.02820 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.02820/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 15 of its 44 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 May 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/agents/general-llm-agent-frameworks-and-benchmarks/)
- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [Process reward models for reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/process-reward-models-for-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [GPT-4o System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21276/) (2024)
- [τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12045/) (2024)
- [Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.11805/) (2023)
- [Evaluation of Text Generation: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.14799/) (2020)
- [BALROG: Benchmarking Agentic LLM and VLM Reasoning On Games](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.13543/) (2024)
- [Yell At Your Robot: Improving On-the-Fly from Language Corrections](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.12910/) (2024)
- [Meta-Prompting: Enhancing Language Models with Task-Agnostic Scaffolding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.12954/) (2024)
- [AgentRewardBench: Evaluating Automatic Evaluations of Web Agent Trajectories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.08942/) (2025)
- [MiniHack the Planet: A Sandbox for Open-Ended Reinforcement Learning Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.13202/) (2021)
- [CIC: Contrastive Intrinsic Control for Unsupervised Skill Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.00161/) (2022)
- [Collaborative Gym: A Framework for Enabling and Evaluating Human-Agent Collaboration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15701/) (2024)
- [Proposer-Agent-Evaluator(PAE): Autonomous Skill Discovery For Foundation Model Internet Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.13194/) (2024)
- [Baba Is AI: Break the Rules to Beat the Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.13729/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Hodoscope: Unsupervised Monitoring for AI Misbehaviors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.11072/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Agents are predominantly evaluated and optimized via task success metrics, which are coarse, rely on manual design from experts, and fail to reward intermediate emergent behaviors. We propose **AutoLibra**, a framework for agent evaluation, that transforms open-ended human feedback *e.g.* "If you find that the button is disabled, don't click it again", or "This agent has too much autonomy to decide what to do on its own" into metrics for evaluating fine-grained behaviors in agent trajectories. AutoLibra accomplishes this by grounding feedback to an agent's behavior, clustering similar positive and negative behaviors, and creating concrete metrics with clear definitions and concrete examples, which can be used for prompting LLM-as-a-Judge as evaluators. We further propose two meta metrics to evaluate the alignment of a set of (induced) metrics with open feedback: "coverage" and "redundancy". Through optimizing these meta-metrics, we experimentally demonstrate AutoLibra's ability to induce more concrete agent evaluation metrics than the ones proposed in previous agent evaluation benchmarks and discover new metrics to analyze agents. We also present two applications of AutoLibra in agent improvement: First, we show that AutoLibra serve human prompt engineers for diagonalize agent failures and improve prompts iterative. Moreover, we find that AutoLibra can induce metrics for automatic optimization for agents, which makes agents improve through self-regulation. Our results suggest that AutoLibra is a powerful task-agnostic tool for evaluating and improving language agents.