# Ensemble Kalman filter for uncertainty in human language comprehension

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.02590 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.02590/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 7 of its 17 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 May 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.04599/) (2017)
- [Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.02142/) (2015)
- [Why ReLU networks yield high-confidence predictions far away from the training data and how to mitigate the problem](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.05720/) (2018)
- [Being Bayesian, Even Just a Bit, Fixes Overconfidence in ReLU Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.10118/) (2020)
- [Bayesian Deep Learning via Subnetwork Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.14689/) (2020)
- [Ensemble Kalman Inversion: A Derivative-Free Technique For Machine Learning Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.03620/) (2018)
- [Never look back - A modified EnKF method and its application to the training of neural networks without back propagation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.08034/) (2018)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial neural networks (ANNs) are widely used in modeling sentence processing but often exhibit deterministic behavior, contrasting with human sentence comprehension, which manages uncertainty during ambiguous or unexpected inputs. This is exemplified by reversal anomalies-sentences with unexpected role reversals that challenge syntax and semantics-highlighting the limitations of traditional ANN models, such as the Sentence Gestalt (SG) Model. To address these limitations, we propose a Bayesian framework for sentence comprehension, applying an extension of the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) for Bayesian inference to quantify uncertainty. By framing language comprehension as a Bayesian inverse problem, this approach enhances the SG model's ability to reflect human sentence processing with respect to the representation of uncertainty. Numerical experiments and comparisons with maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) demonstrate that Bayesian methods improve uncertainty representation, enabling the model to better approximate human cognitive processing when dealing with linguistic ambiguities.