# ASAT: Adaptive Scoring and Thresholding with Human Feedback for Robust Out-of-Distribution Detection

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.02299 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.02299/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 34 of its 60 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 May 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 34)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02136/) (2016)
- [Concrete Problems in AI Safety](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.06565/) (2016)
- [A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.03888/) (2018)
- [Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.02690/) (2017)
- [Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.03759/) (2020)
- [Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.11334/) (2021)
- [Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.1897/) (2014)
- [Out-of-Distribution Detection with Deep Nearest Neighbors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.06507/) (2022)
- [Towards Open Set Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.06233/) (2015)
- [Likelihood Ratios for Out-of-Distribution Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02845/) (2019)
- [ViM: Out-Of-Distribution with Virtual-logit Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.10807/) (2022)
- [Training Confidence-calibrated Classifiers for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.09325/) (2017)
- [OpenOOD: Benchmarking Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.07242/) (2022)
- [SSD: A Unified Framework for Self-Supervised Outlier Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.12051/) (2021)
- [Mitigating Neural Network Overconfidence with Logit Normalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.09310/) (2022)
- [Learning Confidence for Out-of-Distribution Detection in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.04865/) (2018)
- [MOS: Towards Scaling Out-of-distribution Detection for Large Semantic Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.01879/) (2021)
- [Why Normalizing Flows Fail to Detect Out-of-Distribution Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.08545/) (2020)
- [Extremely Simple Activation Shaping for Out-of-Distribution Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.09858/) (2022)
- [Adversarial Reciprocal Points Learning for Open Set Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00953/) (2021)
- [lil' UCB : An Optimal Exploration Algorithm for Multi-Armed Bandits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.7308/) (2013)
- [How to Exploit Hyperspherical Embeddings for Out-of-Distribution Detection?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.04450/) (2022)
- [Learning Optimal Conformal Classifiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.09192/) (2021)
- [Training OOD Detectors in their Natural Habitats](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.03299/) (2022)
- [Self-Supervised Primal-Dual Learning for Constrained Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.09046/) (2022)
- [Sequential estimation of quantiles with applications to A/B-testing and best-arm identification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.09712/) (2019)
- [First-Order Methods for Nonsmooth Nonconvex Functional Constrained Optimization with or without Slater Points](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.00927/) (2022)
- [Taming False Positives in Out-of-Distribution Detection with Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.16954/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Training-Free Human-in-the-Loop Anomaly Detection via Memory Bank Correction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.17775/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Machine Learning (ML) models are trained on in-distribution (ID) data but often encounter out-of-distribution (OOD) inputs during deployment---posing serious risks in safety-critical domains. Recent works have focused on designing scoring functions to quantify OOD uncertainty, with score thresholds typically set based solely on ID data to achieve a target true positive rate (TPR), since OOD data is limited before deployment. However, these TPR-based thresholds leave false positive rates (FPR) uncontrolled, often resulting in high FPRs where OOD points are misclassified as ID. Moreover, fixed scoring functions and thresholds lack the adaptivity needed to handle newly observed, evolving OOD inputs, leading to sub-optimal performance. To address these challenges, we propose ASAT, a human-in-the-loop framework that textitsafely updates both scoring functions and thresholds on the fly based on real-world OOD inputs. ASAT maximizes TPR while controlling FPR at all times under stationary conditions, even as the system adapts over time. Under nonstationary conditions, the method adapts to distribution shifts with only transient FPR violations during the adaptation period. We provide theoretical guarantees for FPR control under stationary conditions and present extensive empirical evaluations on OpenOOD benchmarks to demonstrate that our approach outperforms existing methods by achieving higher TPRs while maintaining FPR control.