# Structured Prompting and Feedback-Guided Reasoning with LLMs for Data Interpretation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.01636 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.01636/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 3 of its 10 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 May 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-benchmarks-and-evaluation/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17651/) (2023)
- [Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Task](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.08887/) (2018)
- [Seq2SQL: Generating Structured Queries from Natural Language using Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.00103/) (2017)

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Vibe Coding vs. Agentic Coding: Fundamentals and Practical Implications of Agentic AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19443/) (2025)
- [Mixture-of-Minds: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Table Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.20176/) (2025)
- [Breaking the Chain: A Causal Analysis of LLM Faithfulness to Intermediate Structures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.16475/) (2026)
- [M-LLM3REC: A Motivation-Aware User-Item Interaction Framework for Enhancing Recommendation Accuracy with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.15262/) (2025)
- [From Chaos to Clarity: Schema-Constrained AI for Auditable Biomedical Evidence Extraction from Full-Text PDFs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.14267/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in natural language understanding and task generalization. However, their application to structured data analysis remains fragile due to inconsistencies in schema interpretation, misalignment between user intent and model output, and limited mechanisms for self-correction when failures occur. This paper introduces the STROT Framework (Structured Task Reasoning and Output Transformation), a method for structured prompting and feedback-driven transformation logic generation aimed at improving the reliability and semantic alignment of LLM-based analytical workflows. STROT begins with lightweight schema introspection and sample-based field classification, enabling dynamic context construction that captures both the structure and statistical profile of the input data. This contextual information is embedded in structured prompts that guide the model toward generating task-specific, interpretable outputs. To address common failure modes in complex queries, STROT incorporates a refinement mechanism in which the model iteratively revises its outputs based on execution feedback and validation signals. Unlike conventional approaches that rely on static prompts or single-shot inference, STROT treats the LLM as a reasoning agent embedded within a controlled analysis loop -- capable of adjusting its output trajectory through planning and correction. The result is a robust and reproducible framework for reasoning over structured data with LLMs, applicable to diverse data exploration and analysis tasks where interpretability, stability, and correctness are essential.