# Adaptive Branch-and-Bound Tree Exploration for Neural Network Verification

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.00963 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.00963/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 29 of its 43 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 May 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 29 of 29)

- [Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6572/) (2014)
- [Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.04644/) (2016)
- [Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.01135/) (2017)
- [Square Attack: a query-efficient black-box adversarial attack via random search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.00049/) (2019)
- [Improving Transferability of Adversarial Examples with Input Diversity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.06978/) (2018)
- [Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytope](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.00851/) (2017)
- [Efficient Neural Network Robustness Certification with General Activation Functions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.00866/) (2018)
- [DeepXplore: Automated Whitebox Testing of Deep Learning Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.06640/) (2017)
- [Safety Verification of Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.06940/) (2016)
- [Formal Verification of Piece-Wise Linear Feed-Forward Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.01320/) (2017)
- [Beta-CROWN: Efficient Bound Propagation with Per-neuron Split Constraints for Complete and Incomplete Neural Network Robustness Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.06624/) (2021)
- [Algorithms for Verifying Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.06758/) (2019)
- [Semidefinite relaxations for certifying robustness to adversarial examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.01057/) (2018)
- [Efficient Formal Safety Analysis of Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.08098/) (2018)
- [Branch and Bound for Piecewise Linear Neural Network Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.06588/) (2019)
- [Maximum Resilience of Artificial Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.01040/) (2017)
- [Complete Verification via Multi-Neuron Relaxation Guided Branch-and-Bound](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.00263/) (2022)
- [PRIMA: General and Precise Neural Network Certification via Scalable Convex Hull Approximations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03638/) (2021)
- [TensorFuzz: Debugging Neural Networks with Coverage-Guided Fuzzing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.10875/) (2018)
- [The Convex Relaxation Barrier, Revisited: Tightened Single-Neuron Relaxations for Neural Network Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.14076/) (2020)
- [Neural Network Verification with Branch-and-Bound for General Nonlinearities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.21063/) (2024)
- [Neural Network Branching for Neural Network Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01329/) (2019)
- [Efficiently Computing Local Lipschitz Constants of Neural Networks via Bound Propagation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.07394/) (2022)
- [Improved Branch and Bound for Neural Network Verification via Lagrangian Decomposition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.06718/) (2021)
- [The Third International Verification of Neural Networks Competition (VNN-COMP 2022): Summary and Results](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10376/) (2022)
- [Improving Neural Network Verification through Spurious Region Guided Refinement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.07722/) (2020)
- [An Abstraction-Refinement Approach to Verifying Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.01978/) (2022)
- [Incremental Verification of Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.01874/) (2023)
- [Two-Layered Falsification of Hybrid Systems guided by Monte Carlo Tree Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.06276/) (2018)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Efficient Neural Network Verification via Order Leading Exploration of Branch-and-Bound Trees](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.17453/) (2025)
- [Mining Verdict Boundaries for Neural Network Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.28954/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Formal verification is a rigorous approach that can provably ensure the quality of neural networks, and to date, Branch and Bound (BaB) is the state-of-the-art that performs verification by splitting the problem as needed and applying off-the-shelf verifiers to sub-problems for improved performance. However, existing BaB may not be efficient, due to its naive way of exploring the space of sub-problems that ignores the importance of different sub-problems. To bridge this gap, we first introduce a notion of ``importance'' that reflects how likely a counterexample can be found with a sub-problem, and then we devise a novel verification approach, called ABONN, that explores the sub-problem space of BaB adaptively, in a Monte-Carlo tree search (MCTS) style. The exploration is guided by the ``importance'' of different sub-problems, so it favors the sub-problems that are more likely to find counterexamples. As soon as it finds a counterexample, it can immediately terminate; even though it cannot find, after visiting all the sub-problems, it can still manage to verify the problem. We evaluate ABONN with 552 verification problems from commonly-used datasets and neural network models, and compare it with the state-of-the-art verifiers as baseline approaches. Experimental evaluation shows that ABONN demonstrates speedups of up to 15.2× on MNIST and 24.7× on CIFAR-10. We further study the influences of hyperparameters to the performance of ABONN, and the effectiveness of our adaptive tree exploration.