# Visual Compositional Tuning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.21850 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.21850/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 31 of its 41 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 30 Apr 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 31)

- [Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08485/) (2023)
- [Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03744/) (2023)
- [Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.14198/) (2022)
- [BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.12086/) (2022)
- [Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01652/) (2021)
- [LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03326/) (2024)
- [Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12966/) (2023)
- [Towards VQA Models That Can Read](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.08920/) (2019)
- [MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13394/) (2023)
- [MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.02490/) (2023)
- [Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.20330/) (2024)
- [Cambrian-1: A Fully Open, Vision-Centric Exploration of Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.16860/) (2024)
- [Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.07075/) (2021)
- [Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.14486/) (2022)
- [SemDeDup: Data-efficient learning at web-scale through semantic deduplication](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.09540/) (2023)
- [SugarCrepe: Fixing Hackable Benchmarks for Vision-Language Compositionality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.14610/) (2023)
- [Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning Methods for Pretrained Language Models: A Critical Review and Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.12148/) (2023)
- [SEED-Bench-2-Plus: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models with Text-Rich Visual Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.16790/) (2024)
- [Does Prompt Formatting Have Any Impact on LLM Performance?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.10541/) (2024)
- [Eagle: Exploring The Design Space for Multimodal LLMs with Mixture of Encoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.15998/) (2024)
- [Understanding the Limits of Vision Language Models Through the Lens of the Binding Problem](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.00238/) (2024)
- [Eagle 2: Building Post-Training Data Strategies from Scratch for Frontier Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.14818/) (2025)
- [D2 Pruning: Message Passing for Balancing Diversity and Difficulty in Data Pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.07931/) (2023)
- [Which of These Best Describes Multiple Choice Evaluation with LLMs? A) Forced B) Flawed C) Fixable D) All of the Above](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14127/) (2025)
- [Your Vision-Language Model Itself Is a Strong Filter: Towards High-Quality Instruction Tuning with Data Selection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.12501/) (2024)
- [Facilitating Multi-turn Function Calling for LLMs via Compositional Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12952/) (2024)
- [MMCOMPOSITION: Revisiting the Compositionality of Pre-trained Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.09733/) (2024)
- [Visual Instruction Tuning towards General-Purpose Multimodal Model: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.16602/) (2023)
- [ICONS: Influence Consensus for Vision-Language Data Selection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.00654/) (2024)
- [Concept-skill Transferability-based Data Selection for Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.10995/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [What's in Common? Multimodal Models Hallucinate When Reasoning Across Scenes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.03768/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Visual instruction tuning (VIT) datasets have grown rapidly in scale, yet the informativeness of individual training samples has largely been overlooked. Recent dataset selection methods have shown that a small fraction of such datasets enriched with informative samples can lead to efficient finetuning of Multimodal Large Language Models. In this work, we explore the impact of sample complexity on informative data curation and introduce COMPACT (COMPositional Atomic-to-complex Visual Compositional Tuning), a compositional VIT data recipe that scales training sample complexity by combining multiple atomic visual capabilities in a single training example. Concretely, we synthesize rich and informative text questions for each image, allowing us to significantly reduce the number of training examples required for effective VIT. COMPACT demonstrates superior data efficiency compared to existing data reduction methods. When applied to the LLaVA-665K VIT dataset, COMPACT reduces the data budget by 90% while still achieving 100.2% of the full VIT performance (compared to only 97.5% by the state-of-the-art method) across eight multimodal benchmarks. Furthermore, training on the COMPACT data outperforms training on the full-scale VIT data on particularly complex benchmarks such as MM-Vet (+8.6%) and MMStar (+2.9%). COMPACT offers a scalable and efficient synthetic data generation recipe to improve on vision-language tasks.