# Navigating AI Policy Landscapes: Insights into Human Rights Considerations Across IEEE Regions

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.19264 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.19264/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 27 Apr 2025.

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Information Suppression in Large Language Models: Auditing, Quantifying, and Characterizing Censorship in DeepSeek](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.12349/) (2025)
- [Can Legal AI Know When It Is Wrong? And Do Students Know When It Is?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.21089/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This paper explores the integration of human rights considerations into AI regulatory frameworks across different IEEE regions - specifically the United States (Region 1-6), Europe (Region 8), China (part of Region 10), and Singapore (part of Region 10). While all acknowledge the transformative potential of AI and the necessity of ethical guidelines, their regulatory approaches significantly differ. Europe exhibits a rigorous framework with stringent protections for individual rights, while the U.S. promotes innovation with less restrictive regulations. China emphasizes state control and societal order in its AI strategies. In contrast, Singapore's advisory framework encourages self-regulation and aligns closely with international norms. This comparative analysis underlines the need for ongoing global dialogue to harmonize AI regulations that safeguard human rights while promoting technological advancement, reflecting the diverse perspectives and priorities of each region.