# Aerial Image Classification in Scarce and Unconstrained Environments via Conformal Prediction

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.17655 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.17655/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 31 of its 49 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Apr 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 31)

- [On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.04599/) (2017)
- [MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.04381/) (2018)
- [Knowledge Distillation: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.05525/) (2020)
- [A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.06225/) (2020)
- [Classification with Valid and Adaptive Coverage](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.02544/) (2020)
- [Revisiting the Calibration of Modern Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.07998/) (2021)
- [Uncertainty Sets for Image Classifiers using Conformal Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.14193/) (2020)
- [Conformal prediction beyond exchangeability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.13415/) (2022)
- [Least Ambiguous Set-Valued Classifiers with Bounded Error Levels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.00451/) (2016)
- [Addressing Failure Prediction by Learning Model Confidence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.04851/) (2019)
- [Wider or Deeper: Revisiting the ResNet Model for Visual Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.10080/) (2016)
- [Logit Standardization in Knowledge Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.01427/) (2024)
- [A Comprehensive Study on Robustness of Image Classification Models: Benchmarking and Rethinking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.14301/) (2023)
- [Reproducibility in Machine Learning-based Research: Overview, Barriers and Drivers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.14325/) (2024)
- [Sources of Irreproducibility in Machine Learning: A Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.07610/) (2022)
- [Bayesian Optimization with Conformal Prediction Sets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.12496/) (2022)
- [Domain Generalization through Meta-Learning: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.02785/) (2024)
- [Beyond Confidence: Reliable Models Should Also Consider Atypicality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18262/) (2023)
- [Conformal Prediction: A Data Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.06494/) (2024)
- [Adaptive Temperature Scaling for Robust Calibration of Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.00461/) (2022)
- [Understanding Impacts of High-Order Loss Approximations and Features in Deep Learning Interpretation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.00407/) (2019)
- [Label Noise Robustness of Conformal Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.14295/) (2022)
- [Conformal Semantic Image Segmentation: Post-hoc Quantification of Predictive Uncertainty](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.05145/) (2024)
- [ERA: A Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Event Recognition in Aerial Videos](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.11394/) (2020)
- [On Temperature Scaling and Conformal Prediction of Deep Classifiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.05806/) (2024)
- [The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Multiclass Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.01350/) (2024)
- [Uncertainty quantification for probabilistic machine learning in earth observation using conformal prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06421/) (2024)
- [Building a stable classifier with the inflated argmax](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14064/) (2024)
- [Parametric Scaling Law of Tuning Bias in Conformal Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.03023/) (2025)
- [Conformal Prediction Sets with Improved Conditional Coverage using Trust Scores](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.10139/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This paper presents a comprehensive empirical analysis of conformal prediction methods on a challenging aerial image dataset featuring diverse events in unconstrained environments. Conformal prediction is a powerful post-hoc technique that takes the output of any classifier and transforms it into a set of likely labels, providing a statistical guarantee on the coverage of the true label. Unlike evaluations on standard benchmarks, our study addresses the complexities of data-scarce and highly variable real-world settings. We investigate the effectiveness of leveraging pretrained models (MobileNet, DenseNet, and ResNet), fine-tuned with limited labeled data, to generate informative prediction sets. To further evaluate the impact of calibration, we consider two parallel pipelines (with and without temperature scaling) and assess performance using two key metrics: empirical coverage and average prediction set size. This setup allows us to systematically examine how calibration choices influence the trade-off between reliability and efficiency. Our findings demonstrate that even with relatively small labeled samples and simple nonconformity scores, conformal prediction can yield valuable uncertainty estimates for complex tasks. Moreover, our analysis reveals that while temperature scaling is often employed for calibration, it does not consistently lead to smaller prediction sets, underscoring the importance of careful consideration in its application. Furthermore, our results highlight the significant potential of model compression techniques within the conformal prediction pipeline for deployment in resource-constrained environments. Based on our observations, we advocate for future research to delve into the impact of noisy or ambiguous labels on conformal prediction performance and to explore effective model reduction strategies.
