# Building A Secure Agentic AI Application Leveraging A2A Protocol

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.16902 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.16902/

## Key facts

- Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 2 of its 43 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Apr 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Agent threats, guardrails and governance](https://mlsanity.com/agents/agent-threats-guardrails-and-governance/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [A Survey of Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning with Communication](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.08975/) (2022)
- [Enterprise-Grade Security for the Model Context Protocol (MCP): Frameworks and Mitigation Strategies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.08623/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [A Survey of Context Engineering for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.13334/) (2025)
- [A Survey of LLM-Driven AI Agent Communication: Protocols, Security Risks, and Defense Countermeasures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.19676/) (2025)
- [A Novel Zero-Trust Identity Framework for Agentic AI: Decentralized Authentication and Fine-Grained Access Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19301/) (2025)
- [From Code Foundation Models to Agents and Applications: A Comprehensive Survey and Practical Guide to Code Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.18538/) (2025)
- [Security Threat Modeling for Emerging AI-Agent Protocols: A Comparative Analysis of MCP, A2A, Agora, and ANP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.11327/) (2026)
- [Attacks and Mitigations for Distributed Governance of Agentic AI under Byzantine Adversaries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.12364/) (2026)
- [Trustworthy Agent Network: Trust in Agent Networks Must Be Baked In, Not Bolted On](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.19035/) (2026)
- [STEM Agent: A Self-Adapting, Tool-Enabled, Extensible Architecture for Multi-Protocol AI Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.22359/) (2026)
- [A Comparative Study of MCP and A2A for Inter-Agent Coordination in LLM-Based Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.23884/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

As Agentic AI systems evolve from basic workflows to complex multi agent collaboration, robust protocols such as Google's Agent2Agent (A2A) become essential enablers. To foster secure adoption and ensure the reliability of these complex interactions, understanding the secure implementation of A2A is essential. This paper addresses this goal by providing a comprehensive security analysis centered on the A2A protocol. We examine its fundamental elements and operational dynamics, situating it within the framework of agent communication development. Utilizing the MAESTRO framework, specifically designed for AI risks, we apply proactive threat modeling to assess potential security issues in A2A deployments, focusing on aspects such as Agent Card management, task execution integrity, and authentication methodologies. Based on these insights, we recommend practical secure development methodologies and architectural best practices designed to build resilient and effective A2A systems. Our analysis also explores how the synergy between A2A and the Model Context Protocol (MCP) can further enhance secure interoperability. This paper equips developers and architects with the knowledge and practical guidance needed to confidently leverage the A2A protocol for building robust and secure next generation agentic applications.