# Enhancing Critical Thinking with AI: A Tailored Warning System for RAG Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.16883 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.16883/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Hallucination detection and mitigation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 8 of its 17 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Apr 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Hallucination detection and mitigation](https://mlsanity.com/lr/hallucination-detection-and-mitigation/)
- Retrieval-augmented generation / [Hallucination detection in RAG](https://mlsanity.com/rag/hallucination-detection-in-rag/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Bias and Unfairness in Information Retrieval Systems: New Challenges in the LLM Era](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.11457/) (2024)
- [Investigating Bias in LLM-Based Bias Detection: Disparities between LLMs and Human Perception](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.14896/) (2024)
- [Decoding Biases: Automated Methods and LLM Judges for Gender Bias Detection in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03907/) (2024)
- [PersonaRAG: Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems with User-Centric Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.09394/) (2024)
- [RAGAR, Your Falsehood Radar: RAG-Augmented Reasoning for Political Fact-Checking using Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.12065/) (2024)
- [Does RAG Introduce Unfairness in LLMs? Evaluating Fairness in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.19804/) (2024)
- [Retrieval Meets Reasoning: Even High-school Textbook Knowledge Benefits Multimodal Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.20834/) (2024)
- [Fakes of Varying Shades: How Warning Affects Human Perception and Engagement Regarding LLM Hallucinations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.03745/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems offer a powerful approach to enhancing large language model (LLM) outputs by incorporating fact-checked, contextually relevant information. However, fairness and reliability concerns persist, as hallucinations can emerge at both the retrieval and generation stages, affecting users' reasoning and decision-making. Our research explores how tailored warning messages -- whose content depends on the specific context of hallucination -- shape user reasoning and actions in an educational quiz setting. Preliminary findings suggest that while warnings improve accuracy and awareness of high-level hallucinations, they may also introduce cognitive friction, leading to confusion and diminished trust in the system. By examining these interactions, this work contributes to the broader goal of AI-augmented reasoning: developing systems that actively support human reflection, critical thinking, and informed decision-making rather than passive information consumption.