# IRIS: Interactive Research Ideation System for Accelerating Scientific Discovery

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.16728 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.16728/

## Key facts

- Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 33 of its 58 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Apr 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 33)

- [From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.16130/) (2024)
- [The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.06292/) (2024)
- [Fact or Fiction: Verifying Scientific Claims](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.14974/) (2020)
- [Agent Laboratory: Using LLM Agents as Research Assistants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.04227/) (2025)
- [Monitoring Reasoning Models for Misbehavior and the Risks of Promoting Obfuscation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.11926/) (2025)
- [MLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning Experimentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03302/) (2023)
- [Can LLMs Generate Novel Research Ideas? A Large-Scale Human Study with 100+ NLP Researchers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.04109/) (2024)
- [rStar-Math: Small LLMs Can Master Math Reasoning with Self-Evolved Deep Thinking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.04519/) (2025)
- [SciMON: Scientific Inspiration Machines Optimized for Novelty](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14259/) (2023)
- [Emergent Misalignment: Narrow finetuning can produce broadly misaligned LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.17424/) (2025)
- [CycleResearcher: Improving Automated Research via Automated Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.00816/) (2024)
- [Mutual Reasoning Makes Smaller LLMs Stronger Problem-Solvers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.06195/) (2024)
- [Language agents achieve superhuman synthesis of scientific knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.13740/) (2024)
- [Chain of Ideas: Revolutionizing Research Via Novel Idea Development with LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.13185/) (2024)
- [OpenScholar: Synthesizing Scientific Literature with Retrieval-augmented LMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.14199/) (2024)
- [NLPeer: A Unified Resource for the Computational Study of Peer Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.06651/) (2022)
- [Lean Copilot: Large Language Models as Copilots for Theorem Proving in Lean](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.12534/) (2024)
- [Design Principles for Generative AI Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.14484/) (2024)
- [Nova: An Iterative Planning and Search Approach to Enhance Novelty and Diversity of LLM Generated Ideas](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.14255/) (2024)
- [CiteME: Can Language Models Accurately Cite Scientific Claims?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.12861/) (2024)
- [IdeaSynth: Iterative Research Idea Development Through Evolving and Composing Idea Facets with Literature-Grounded Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.04025/) (2024)
- [Human-LLM Compound System for Scientific Ideation through Facet Recombination and Novelty Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.14634/) (2024)
- [DISAPERE: A Dataset for Discourse Structure in Peer Review Discussions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.08520/) (2021)
- [CoQuest: Exploring Research Question Co-Creation with an LLM-based Agent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06155/) (2023)
- [Understanding Users' Dissatisfaction with ChatGPT Responses: Types, Resolving Tactics, and the Effect of Knowledge Level](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07434/) (2023)
- [Bandit Algorithms for Tree Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1408.2028/) (2014)
- [Ai2 Scholar QA: Organized Literature Synthesis with Attribution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10861/) (2025)
- [OpenResearcher: Unleashing AI for Accelerated Scientific Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.06941/) (2024)
- [Can Large Language Models Unlock Novel Scientific Research Ideas?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.06185/) (2024)
- [Scientific Language Models for Biomedical Knowledge Base Completion: An Empirical Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09700/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [A Survey of Agentic Reasoning for Large Language Models: Towards Recursively Self-Improving and Collective Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.12538/) (2026)
- [AI Scientists Fail Without Strong Implementation Capability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.01372/) (2025)
- [CellForge: Agentic Design of Virtual Cell Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.02276/) (2025)
- [ScholarEval: Research Idea Evaluation Grounded in Literature](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.16234/) (2025)
- [AI for Auto-Research: Roadmap & User Guide](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.18661/) (2026)
- [Measuring the Gap Between Human and LLM Research Ideas](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.01233/) (2026)
- [Autonomous Research Agents: A Survey of AI Scientists and the Verification Gap](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.05179/) (2026)
- [HiRAS: A Hierarchical Multi-Agent Framework for Paper-to-Code Generation and Execution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.17745/) (2026)
- [Perspectra: Choosing Your Experts Enhances Critical Thinking in Multi-Agent Research Ideation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.20553/) (2025)
- [OpenLens AI: Fully Autonomous Research Agent for Health Infomatics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.14778/) (2025)
- [PaperAudit-Bench: Benchmarking Error Detection in Research Papers for Critical Automated Peer Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.19916/) (2026)
- [ResearchStudio-Idea: An Evidence-Grounded Research-Ideation Skill Suite from ML Conference Outcomes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.04439/) (2026)
- [SciDER: Scientific Data-centric End-to-end Researcher](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.01421/) (2026)
- [Dr. Claw: An AI Scientist Workspace for Vibe Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.00365/) (2026)
- [Evolving and Executing Research Plans via Double-Loop Multi-Agent Collaboration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.06761/) (2025)
- [Toward Auto-Research: Mining Falsifiable Research Ideas from Paper Knowledge Graphs with Categorical Structure](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.20361/) (2026)
- [Can Scientific Claims Be Removed from Large Language Models? A Systematic Evaluation of Claim-Level Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.20960/) (2026)
- [When LLM Meets Tree Search: A Systematic View of Inference as Search in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.30395/) (2026)
- [Learning to Ideate for Scientific Impact](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.29802/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid advancement in capabilities of large language models (LLMs) raises a pivotal question: How can LLMs accelerate scientific discovery? This work tackles the crucial first stage of research, generating novel hypotheses. While recent work on automated hypothesis generation focuses on multi-agent frameworks and extending test-time compute, none of the approaches effectively incorporate transparency and steerability through a synergistic Human-in-the-loop (HITL) approach. To address this gap, we introduce IRIS: Interactive Research Ideation System, an open-source platform designed for researchers to leverage LLM-assisted scientific ideation. IRIS incorporates innovative features to enhance ideation, including adaptive test-time compute expansion via Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS), fine-grained feedback mechanism, and query-based literature synthesis. Designed to empower researchers with greater control and insight throughout the ideation process. We additionally conduct a user study with researchers across diverse disciplines, validating the effectiveness of our system in enhancing ideation. We open-source our code at https://github.com/Anikethh/IRIS-Interactive-Research-Ideation-System
