# Co-Writing with AI, on Human Terms: Aligning Research with User Demands Across the Writing Process

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.12488 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.12488/

## Key facts

- Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 53 of its 153 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 53)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [CoAuthor: Designing a Human-AI Collaborative Writing Dataset for Exploring Language Model Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.06796/) (2022)
- [Co-Writing Screenplays and Theatre Scripts with Language Models: An Evaluation by Industry Professionals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.14958/) (2022)
- [Co-Writing with Opinionated Language Models Affects Users' Views](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.00560/) (2023)
- [Gmail Smart Compose: Real-Time Assisted Writing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.00080/) (2019)
- ['It's Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage'; Perceptions of Justice in Algorithmic Decisions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.10408/) (2018)
- [Sparks: Inspiration for Science Writing using Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.07640/) (2021)
- [A Design Space for Intelligent and Interactive Writing Assistants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.14117/) (2024)
- [Creative Writing with an AI-Powered Writing Assistant: Perspectives from Professional Writers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.05030/) (2022)
- [Luminate: Structured Generation and Exploration of Design Space with Large Language Models for Human-AI Co-Creation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.12953/) (2023)
- [The Impact of Multiple Parallel Phrase Suggestions on Email Input and Composition Behaviour of Native and Non-Native English Writers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.09157/) (2021)
- [Shaping Human-AI Collaboration: Varied Scaffolding Levels in Co-writing with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11723/) (2024)
- [Beyond Text Generation: Supporting Writers with Continuous Automatic Text Summaries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.09323/) (2022)
- [VISAR: A Human-AI Argumentative Writing Assistant with Visual Programming and Rapid Draft Prototyping](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07810/) (2023)
- [AI-Augmented Brainwriting: Investigating the use of LLMs in group ideation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14978/) (2024)
- [The Value, Benefits, and Concerns of Generative AI-Powered Assistance in Writing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.12004/) (2024)
- [Choice Over Control: How Users Write with Large Language Models using Diegetic and Non-Diegetic Prompting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.03199/) (2023)
- [Writer-Defined AI Personas for On-Demand Feedback Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.10433/) (2023)
- [Beyond the Chat: Executable and Verifiable Text-Editing with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.15337/) (2023)
- [ConvXAI: Delivering Heterogeneous AI Explanations via Conversations to Support Human-AI Scientific Writing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.09770/) (2023)
- [LaMPost: Design and Evaluation of an AI-assisted Email Writing Prototype for Adults with Dyslexia](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.02308/) (2022)
- [Interacting with next-phrase suggestions: How suggestion systems aid and influence the cognitive processes of writing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.00636/) (2022)
- [The HaLLMark Effect: Supporting Provenance and Transparent Use of Large Language Models in Writing with Interactive Visualization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.13057/) (2023)
- [Fluid Transformers and Creative Analogies: Exploring Large Language Models' Capacity for Augmenting Cross-Domain Analogical Creativity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.12832/) (2023)
- [The AI Ghostwriter Effect: When Users Do Not Perceive Ownership of AI-Generated Text But Self-Declare as Authors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.03283/) (2023)
- [Collaborative Storytelling with Large-scale Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.10208/) (2020)
- [Designing Participatory AI: Creative Professionals' Worries and Expectations about Generative AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08931/) (2023)
- ["If the Machine Is As Good As Me, Then What Use Am I?" -- How the Use of ChatGPT Changes Young Professionals' Perception of Productivity and Accomplishment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.12549/) (2024)
- [CharacterChat: Supporting the Creation of Fictional Characters through Conversation and Progressive Manifestation with a Chatbot](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.12314/) (2021)
- [Rambler: Supporting Writing With Speech via LLM-Assisted Gist Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.10838/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [HACo-Det: A Study Towards Fine-Grained Machine-Generated Text Detection under Human-AI Coauthoring](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.02959/) (2025)
- [Where Do I 'Add the Egg'?: Exploring Agency and Ownership in AI Creative Co-Writing Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.15440/) (2025)
- [Collaborative Document Editing with Multiple Users and AI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.11826/) (2025)
- [Reactive Writers: How Co-Writing with AI Changes How We Engage with Ideas](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.10374/) (2026)
- [The Universal Landscape of Human Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.21623/) (2025)
- [Accepted with Minor Revisions: Value of AI-Assisted Scientific Writing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.12529/) (2025)
- [What happens when reviewers receive AI feedback in their reviews?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.13817/) (2026)
- [From Use to Oversight: How Mental Models Influence User Behavior and Output in AI Writing Assistants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.05166/) (2026)
- [Can You Make It Sound Like You? Post-Editing LLM-Generated Text for Personal Style](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.24444/) (2026)
- [Componentization: Decomposing Monolithic LLM Responses into Manipulable Semantic Units](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.08203/) (2025)
- [TreeWriter: AI-Assisted Hierarchical Planning and Writing for Long-Form Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.12740/) (2026)
- [Beyond Compliance: How AI Could Help Creative Writers by Refusing Them](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.16272/) (2026)
- [Nonslop: A Gamified Experiment in Human-AI Collaborative Writing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.12350/) (2026)
- [PeerPen: AI-Assisted Writing for Online Mental Health Peer Support](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.14886/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

As generative AI tools like ChatGPT become integral to everyday writing, critical questions arise about how to preserve writers' sense of agency and ownership when using these tools. Yet, a systematic understanding of how AI assistance affects different aspects of the writing process - and how this shapes writers' agency - remains underexplored. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic review of 109 HCI papers using the PRISMA approach. From this literature, we identify four overarching design strategies for AI writing support: structured guidance, guided exploration, active co-writing, and critical feedback - mapped across the four key cognitive processes in writing: planning, translating, reviewing, and monitoring. We complement this analysis with interviews of 15 writers across diverse domains. Our findings reveal that writers' desired levels of AI intervention vary across the writing process: content-focused writers (e.g., academics) prioritize ownership during planning, while form-focused writers (e.g., creatives) value control over translating and reviewing. Writers' preferences are also shaped by contextual goals, values, and notions of originality and authorship. By examining when ownership matters, what writers want to own, and how AI interactions shape agency, we surface both alignment and gaps between research and user needs. Our findings offer actionable design guidance for developing human-centered writing tools for co-writing with AI, on human terms.