# Unveiling Hidden Collaboration within Mixture-of-Experts in Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.12359 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.12359/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in MoE large language models, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts.
- Builds on 17 of its 29 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2025.

## Placed in

- Mixture-of-experts / [MoE large language models](https://mlsanity.com/moe/moe-large-language-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.07461/) (2018)
- [Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.05457/) (2018)
- [HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.07830/) (2019)
- [Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.03961/) (2021)
- [PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.11641/) (2019)
- [BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.10044/) (2019)
- [Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.02789/) (2018)
- [DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06066/) (2024)
- [Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04093/) (2024)
- [OpenMoE: An Early Effort on Open Mixture-of-Experts Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01739/) (2024)
- [Improving Dictionary Learning with Gated Sparse Autoencoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.16014/) (2024)
- [Not All Experts are Equal: Efficient Expert Pruning and Skipping for Mixture-of-Experts Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14800/) (2024)
- [Visual Compositional Learning for Human-Object Interaction Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.12407/) (2020)
- [Merge, Then Compress: Demystify Efficient SMoE with Hints from Its Routing Policy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01334/) (2023)
- [Detecting Human-Object Interaction via Fabricated Compositional Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.08214/) (2021)
- [Diversifying the Expert Knowledge for Task-Agnostic Pruning in Sparse Mixture-of-Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.09590/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Two Experts Are All You Need for Steering Thinking: Reinforcing Cognitive Effort in MoE Reasoning Models Without Additional Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14681/) (2025)
- [Sparse Models, Sparse Safety: Unsafe Routes in Mixture-of-Experts LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.08621/) (2026)
- [SHAPE: Coalition-Aware Expert Pruning for Sparse Mixture-of-Experts LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.09886/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Mixture-of-Experts based large language models (MoE LLMs) have shown significant promise in multitask adaptability by dynamically routing inputs to specialized experts. Despite their success, the collaborative mechanisms among experts are still not well understood, limiting both the interpretability and optimization of these models. In this paper, we focus on two critical issues: (1) identifying expert collaboration patterns, and (2) optimizing MoE LLMs through expert pruning. To address the first issue, we propose a hierarchical sparse dictionary learning (HSDL) method that uncovers the collaboration patterns among experts. For the second issue, we introduce the Contribution-Aware Expert Pruning (CAEP) algorithm, which effectively prunes low-contribution experts. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that expert collaboration patterns are closely linked to specific input types and exhibit semantic significance across various tasks. Moreover, pruning experiments show that our approach improves overall performance by 2.5% on average, outperforming existing methods. These findings offer valuable insights into enhancing the efficiency and interpretability of MoE LLMs, offering a clearer understanding of expert interactions and improving model optimization.