# Exploring the Impact of Personality Traits on Conversational Recommender Systems: A Simulation with Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.12313 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.12313/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 16 of its 47 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Apr 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Express Personality Traits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.02547/) (2023)
- [InCharacter: Evaluating Personality Fidelity in Role-Playing Agents through Psychological Interviews](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.17976/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Conversational Recommender Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.00646/) (2020)
- [Large Language Models as Zero-Shot Conversational Recommenders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10053/) (2023)
- [Improving Conversational Recommender Systems via Knowledge Graph based Semantic Fusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.04032/) (2020)
- [Advances and Challenges in Conversational Recommender Systems: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.09459/) (2021)
- [Towards Knowledge-Based Recommender Dialog System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.05391/) (2019)
- [Who is GPT-3? An Exploration of Personality, Values and Demographics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.14338/) (2022)
- [Towards Unified Conversational Recommender Systems via Knowledge-Enhanced Prompt Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.09363/) (2022)
- [Interactive Path Reasoning on Graph for Conversational Recommendation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.00194/) (2020)
- [DuRecDial 2.0: A Bilingual Parallel Corpus for Conversational Recommendation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.08877/) (2021)
- [Learning to Ask Appropriate Questions in Conversational Recommendation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.04774/) (2021)
- [Large Language Models are as persuasive as humans, but how? About the cognitive effort and moral-emotional language of LLM arguments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.09329/) (2024)
- [In-Context Learning User Simulators for Task-Oriented Dialog Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00774/) (2023)
- [Conversational Recommender System and Large Language Model Are Made for Each Other in E-commerce Pre-sales Dialogue](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.14626/) (2023)
- [UPLex: Fine-Grained Personality Control in Large Language Models via Unsupervised Lexical Modulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.16582/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [RecoWorld: Building Simulated Environments for Agentic Recommender Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.10397/) (2025)
- [IGD: Token Decisiveness Modeling via Information Gain in LLMs for Personalized Recommendation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.13229/) (2025)
- [Reinforced Strategy Optimization for Conversational Recommender Systems via Network-of-Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.26093/) (2025)
- [Know You Before You Speak: User-State Modeling for LLM Personalization in Multi-Turn Conversation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.24647/) (2026)
- [PsyBer-Agent: A Psychology-Driven User Agent for Recommender Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.13989/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Conversational Recommender Systems (CRSs) engage users in multi-turn interactions to deliver personalized recommendations. The emergence of large language models (LLMs) further enhances these systems by enabling more natural and dynamic user interactions. However, a key challenge remains in understanding how personality traits shape conversational recommendation outcomes. Psychological evidence highlights the influence of personality traits on user interaction behaviors. To address this, we introduce an LLM-based personality-aware user simulation for CRSs (PerCRS). The user agent induces customizable personality traits and preferences, while the system agent possesses the persuasion capability to simulate realistic interaction in CRSs. We incorporate multi-aspect evaluation to ensure robustness and conduct extensive analysis from both user and system perspectives. Experimental results demonstrate that state-of-the-art LLMs can effectively generate diverse user responses aligned with specified personality traits, thereby prompting CRSs to dynamically adjust their recommendation strategies. Our experimental analysis offers empirical insights into the impact of personality traits on the outcomes of conversational recommender systems.