# Kongzi: A Historical Large Language Model with Fact Enhancement

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.09488 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.09488/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 24 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [Qwen2.5 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15115/) (2024)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.10997/) (2023)
- [A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15594/) (2024)
- [Show Your Work: Scratchpads for Intermediate Computation with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.00114/) (2021)
- [INSIDE: LLMs' Internal States Retain the Power of Hallucination Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03744/) (2024)
- [DPO Meets PPO: Reinforced Token Optimization for RLHF](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.18922/) (2024)
- [The CoT Collection: Improving Zero-shot and Few-shot Learning of Language Models via Chain-of-Thought Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14045/) (2023)
- [Group Robust Preference Optimization in Reward-free RLHF](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.20304/) (2024)
- [ReasonFlux: Hierarchical LLM Reasoning via Scaling Thought Templates](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.06772/) (2025)
- [Towards Better Chain-of-Thought Prompting Strategies: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.04959/) (2023)
- [EvaGaussians: Event Stream Assisted Gaussian Splatting from Blurry Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.20224/) (2024)
- [Learning to Maximize Mutual Information for Chain-of-Thought Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03348/) (2024)
- [Investigating Mysteries of CoT-Augmented Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.14511/) (2024)
- [NeuralGS: Bridging Neural Fields and 3D Gaussian Splatting for Compact 3D Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.23162/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Reasoning Models Hallucinate More: Factuality-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Large Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.24630/) (2025)
- [GS2E: Gaussian Splatting is an Effective Data Generator for Event Stream Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.15287/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The capabilities of the latest large language models (LLMs) have been extended from pure natural language understanding to complex reasoning tasks. However, current reasoning models often exhibit factual inaccuracies in longer reasoning chains, which poses challenges for historical reasoning and limits the potential of LLMs in complex, knowledge-intensive tasks. Historical studies require not only the accurate presentation of factual information but also the ability to establish cross-temporal correlations and derive coherent conclusions from fragmentary and often ambiguous sources. To address these challenges, we propose Kongzi, a large language model specifically designed for historical analysis. Through the integration of curated, high-quality historical data and a novel fact-reinforcement learning strategy, Kongzi demonstrates strong factual alignment and sophisticated reasoning depth. Extensive experiments on tasks such as historical question answering and narrative generation demonstrate that Kongzi outperforms existing models in both factual accuracy and reasoning depth. By effectively addressing the unique challenges inherent in historical texts, Kongzi sets a new standard for the development of accurate and reliable LLMs in professional domains.