# LLM-based Automated Grading with Human-in-the-Loop

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.05239 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.05239/

## Key facts

- Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 24 of its 45 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10084/) (2019)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [GPT-4o System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21276/) (2024)
- [Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03741/) (2017)
- [An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.04747/) (2016)
- [Automatic Prompt Optimization with "Gradient Descent" and Beam Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.03495/) (2023)
- [Dynamic Prompt Learning via Policy Gradient for Semi-structured Mathematical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.14610/) (2022)
- [A Survey of Human-in-the-loop for Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.00941/) (2021)
- [Large Language Models for Education: A Survey and Outlook](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.18105/) (2024)
- [Revolutionizing Finance with LLMs: An Overview of Applications and Insights](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.11641/) (2024)
- [Practical and Ethical Challenges of Large Language Models in Education: A Systematic Scoping Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.13379/) (2023)
- [LLM A*: Human in the Loop Large Language Models Enabled A* Search for Robotics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.01797/) (2023)
- [Bringing Generative AI to Adaptive Learning in Education](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14601/) (2024)
- [Human-in-the-Loop through Chain-of-Thought](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.07932/) (2023)
- [Towards LLM-based Autograding for Short Textual Answers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.11508/) (2023)
- [Automated Grading and Feedback Tools for Programming Education: A Systematic Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.11722/) (2023)
- [Grade Like a Human: Rethinking Automated Assessment with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.19694/) (2024)
- [A LLM-Powered Automatic Grading Framework with Human-Level Guidelines Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02165/) (2024)
- [Human-in-the-loop Machine Translation with Large Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.08908/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [COMPASS: Enhancing Agent Long-Horizon Reasoning with Evolving Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.08790/) (2025)
- [Enabling Self-Improving Agents to Learn at Test Time With Human-In-The-Loop Guidance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.17131/) (2025)
- [A Call for Collaborative Intelligence: Why Human-Agent Systems Should Precede AI Autonomy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.09420/) (2025)
- [mR3: Multilingual Rubric-Agnostic Reward Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.01146/) (2025)
- [Rubric-Conditioned LLM Grading: Alignment, Uncertainty, and Robustness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.08843/) (2025)
- [Pensieve Grader: An AI-Powered, Ready-to-Use Platform for Effortless Handwritten STEM Grading](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.01431/) (2025)
- [Towards Transparent AI Grading: Semantic Entropy as a Signal for Human-AI Disagreement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.04105/) (2025)
- [How Uncertain Is the Grade? A Benchmark of Uncertainty Metrics for LLM-Based Automatic Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.16039/) (2026)
- ["**Important** You should give me full credits!": Exploring Prompt Injection Attacks on LLM-Based Automatic Grading Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.03090/) (2026)
- [Automated Grading of Handwritten Mathematics Using Vision-Capable LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.19043/) (2026)
- [From Automation to Collaboration: Human-in-the-Loop Methods for Safe and Trustworthy NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.25226/) (2026)
- [LLMs as Teaching Assistants for Mathematics Exam Grading: Reliability, and Practical Usability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.01247/) (2026)
- [A Human-in-the-Loop Framework for AI-Assisted Scoring in Large-Scale Writing Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.05143/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, particularly large language models (LLMs), has brought significant advancements to the field of education. Among various applications, automatic short answer grading (ASAG), which focuses on evaluating open-ended textual responses, has seen remarkable progress with the introduction of LLMs. These models not only enhance grading performance compared to traditional ASAG approaches but also move beyond simple comparisons with predefined "golden" answers, enabling more sophisticated grading scenarios, such as rubric-based evaluation. However, existing LLM-powered methods still face challenges in achieving human-level grading performance in rubric-based assessments due to their reliance on fully automated approaches. In this work, we explore the potential of LLMs in ASAG tasks by leveraging their interactive capabilities through a human-in-the-loop (HITL) approach. Our proposed framework, GradeHITL, utilizes the generative properties of LLMs to pose questions to human experts, incorporating their insights to refine grading rubrics dynamically. This adaptive process significantly improves grading accuracy, outperforming existing methods and bringing ASAG closer to human-level evaluation.
