# QE-RAG: A Robust Retrieval-Augmented Generation Benchmark for Query Entry Errors

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.04062 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.04062/

## Key facts

- Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation.
- Builds on 21 of its 38 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Apr 2025.

## Placed in

- Retrieval-augmented generation / [RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/rag/rag-robustness-and-adaptive-retrieval/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.09600/) (2018)
- [TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.03551/) (2017)
- [Improving language models by retrieving from trillions of tokens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.04426/) (2021)
- [Constructing A Multi-hop QA Dataset for Comprehensive Evaluation of Reasoning Steps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.01060/) (2020)
- [REPLUG: Retrieval-Augmented Black-Box Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.12652/) (2023)
- [Precise Zero-Shot Dense Retrieval without Relevance Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10496/) (2022)
- [LongLLMLingua: Accelerating and Enhancing LLMs in Long Context Scenarios via Prompt Compression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06839/) (2023)
- [Ragas: Automated Evaluation of Retrieval Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.15217/) (2023)
- [Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models with Iterative Retrieval-Generation Synergy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15294/) (2023)
- [Benchmarking Large Language Models in Retrieval-Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.01431/) (2023)
- [ARES: An Automated Evaluation Framework for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09476/) (2023)
- [RAFT: Adapting Language Model to Domain Specific RAG](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.10131/) (2024)
- [FlashRAG: A Modular Toolkit for Efficient Retrieval-Augmented Generation Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.13576/) (2024)
- [Query2doc: Query Expansion with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.07678/) (2023)
- [Is ChatGPT a Highly Fluent Grammatical Error Correction System? A Comprehensive Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.01746/) (2023)
- [RECALL: A Benchmark for LLMs Robustness against External Counterfactual Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.08147/) (2023)
- [Neural Retrievers are Biased Towards LLM-Generated Content](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.20501/) (2023)
- [Information Retrieval Meets Large Language Models: A Strategic Report from Chinese IR Community](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09751/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [RARE: Retrieval-Aware Robustness Evaluation for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.00789/) (2025)
- [PrLM: Learning Explicit Reasoning for Personalized RAG via Contrastive Reward Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.07342/) (2025)
- [Memory in Large Language Models: Mechanisms, Evaluation and Evolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.18868/) (2025)
- [A Survey on AgentOps: Categorization, Challenges, and Future Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.02121/) (2025)
- [Telco-oRAG: Optimizing Retrieval-augmented Generation for Telecom Queries via Hybrid Retrieval and Neural Routing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.11856/) (2025)
- [How You Ask Matters! Adaptive RAG Robustness to Query Variations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.10745/) (2026)
- [Improving Consistency in Retrieval-Augmented Systems with Group Similarity Rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.04392/) (2025)
- [Coverage, Not Averages: Semantic Stratification for Trustworthy Retrieval Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.20763/) (2026)
- [Sandwich Reasoning: An Answer-Reasoning-Answer Approach for Low-Latency Query Correction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.03672/) (2026)
- [Agent System Operations: Categorization, Challenges, and Future Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.01581/) (2026)
- [RAGStress: A controlled benchmark for evaluating retrieval-augmented generation under knowledge-base degradation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.04691/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Retriever-augmented generation (RAG) has become a widely adopted approach for enhancing the factual accuracy of large language models (LLMs). While current benchmarks evaluate the performance of RAG methods from various perspectives, they share a common assumption that user queries used for retrieval are error-free. However, in real-world interactions between users and LLMs, query entry errors such as keyboard proximity errors, visual similarity errors, and spelling errors are frequent. The impact of these errors on current RAG methods against such errors remains largely unexplored. To bridge this gap, we propose QE-RAG, the first robust RAG benchmark designed specifically to evaluate performance against query entry errors. We augment six widely used datasets by injecting three common types of query entry errors into randomly selected user queries at rates of 20% and 40%, simulating typical user behavior in real-world scenarios. We analyze the impact of these errors on LLM outputs and find that corrupted queries degrade model performance, which can be mitigated through query correction and training a robust retriever for retrieving relevant documents. Based on these insights, we propose a contrastive learning-based robust retriever training method and a retrieval-augmented query correction method. Extensive in-domain and cross-domain experiments reveal that: (1) state-of-the-art RAG methods including sequential, branching, and iterative methods, exhibit poor robustness to query entry errors; (2) our method significantly enhances the robustness of RAG when handling query entry errors and it's compatible with existing RAG methods, further improving their robustness.