# Evaluating AI Recruitment Sourcing Tools by Human Preference

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.02463 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.02463/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 4 of its 5 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10084/) (2019)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.04132/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [An Interactive Agent for Requirement-Driven Candidate Sourcing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.23501/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This study introduces a benchmarking methodology designed to evaluate the performance of AI-driven recruitment sourcing tools. We created and utilized a dataset to perform a comparative analysis of search results generated by leading AI-based solutions, LinkedIn Recruiter, and our proprietary system, Pearch.ai. Human experts assessed the relevance of the returned candidates, and an Elo rating system was applied to quantitatively measure each tool's comparative performance. Our findings indicate that AI-driven recruitment sourcing tools consistently outperform LinkedIn Recruiter in candidate relevance, with Pearch.ai achieving the highest performance scores. Furthermore, we found a strong alignment between AI-based evaluations and human judgments, highlighting the potential for advanced AI technologies to substantially enhance talent acquisition effectiveness. Code and supporting data are publicly available at https://github.com/vslaykovsky/ai-sourcing-benchmark