# VerifiAgent: a Unified Verification Agent in Language Model Reasoning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.00406 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.00406/

## Key facts

- Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 17 of its 40 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-benchmarks-and-evaluation/)
- LLM agents and tool use / [General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/agents/general-llm-agent-frameworks-and-benchmarks/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [Qwen2.5 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15115/) (2024)
- [Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03314/) (2024)
- [A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15594/) (2024)
- [Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12122/) (2024)
- [Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21787/) (2024)
- [From Generation to Judgment: Opportunities and Challenges of LLM-as-a-judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.16594/) (2024)
- [The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.07301/) (2025)
- [On the Self-Verification Limitations of Large Language Models on Reasoning and Planning Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.08115/) (2024)
- [Scaling Test-Time Compute Without Verification or RL is Suboptimal](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12118/) (2025)
- [The Limits of Inference Scaling Through Resampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.17501/) (2024)
- [Improving LLM Reasoning through Scaling Inference Computation with Collaborative Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.05318/) (2024)
- [Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Key Condition Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14092/) (2024)
- [Strategies for Improving NL-to-FOL Translation with LLMs: Data Generation, Incremental Fine-Tuning, and Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.16461/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Self-Improvements in Modern Agentic Systems: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.13104/) (2026)
- [Agent-as-a-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.05111/) (2026)
- [The Evolution of Tool Use in LLM Agents: From Single-Tool Call to Multi-Tool Orchestration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.22862/) (2026)
- [AJ-Bench: Benchmarking Agent-as-a-Judge for Environment-Aware Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.18240/) (2026)
- [DynaDebate: Breaking Homogeneity in Multi-Agent Debate with Dynamic Path Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.05746/) (2026)
- [All Roads Lead to Rome: Graph-Based Confidence Estimation for Large Language Model Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.12908/) (2025)
- [Residual Drift Dominates Contradiction in Multi-Turn Constraint Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.23940/) (2026)
- [Omni-Decision: Evidence-Ledger Planning for Omni-Modal Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.11433/) (2026)
- [Grading the Graders: Verification Autonomy Levels (L0-L5) for LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.19009/) (2026)
- [Clarify the User or Verify the World? Uncertainty Routing for Proactive Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.32255/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models demonstrate remarkable reasoning capabilities but often produce unreliable or incorrect responses. Existing verification methods are typically model-specific or domain-restricted, requiring significant computational resources and lacking scalability across diverse reasoning tasks. To address these limitations, we propose VerifiAgent, a unified verification agent that integrates two levels of verification: meta-verification, which assesses completeness and consistency in model responses, and tool-based adaptive verification, where VerifiAgent autonomously selects appropriate verification tools based on the reasoning type, including mathematical, logical, or commonsense reasoning. This adaptive approach ensures both efficiency and robustness across different verification scenarios. Experimental results show that VerifiAgent outperforms baseline verification methods (e.g., deductive verifier, backward verifier) among all reasoning tasks. Additionally, it can further enhance reasoning accuracy by leveraging feedback from verification results. VerifiAgent can also be effectively applied to inference scaling, achieving better results with fewer generated samples and costs compared to existing process reward models in the mathematical reasoning domain. Code is available at https://github.com/Jiuzhouh/VerifiAgent