# Context-Independent OCR with Multimodal LLMs: Effects of Image Resolution and Visual Complexity

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.23667 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.23667/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Document understanding and multimodal RAG, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 8 of its 10 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2025.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Document understanding and multimodal RAG](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/document-understanding-and-multimodal-rag/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [NExT-GPT: Any-to-Any Multimodal LLM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.05519/) (2023)
- [OCRBench: On the Hidden Mystery of OCR in Large Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.07895/) (2023)
- [VTimeLLM: Empower LLM to Grasp Video Moments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.18445/) (2023)
- [TextMonkey: An OCR-Free Large Multimodal Model for Understanding Document](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.04473/) (2024)
- [OCRBench v2: An Improved Benchmark for Evaluating Large Multimodal Models on Visual Text Localization and Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.00321/) (2024)
- [BLIVA: A Simple Multimodal LLM for Better Handling of Text-Rich Visual Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.09936/) (2023)
- [LayoutLLM-T2I: Eliciting Layout Guidance from LLM for Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.05095/) (2023)
- [Exploring OCR Capabilities of GPT-4V(ision) : A Quantitative and In-depth Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.16809/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Evaluating LLMs for Historical Document OCR: A Methodological Framework for Digital Humanities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.06743/) (2025)
- [TexOCR: Advancing Document OCR Models for Compilable Page-to-LaTeX Reconstruction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.22880/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Due to their high versatility in tasks such as image captioning, document analysis, and automated content generation, multimodal Large Language Models (LLMs) have attracted significant attention across various industrial fields. In particular, they have been shown to surpass specialized models in Optical Character Recognition (OCR). Nevertheless, their performance under different image conditions remains insufficiently investigated, and individual character recognition is not guaranteed due to their reliance on contextual cues. In this work, we examine a context-independent OCR task using single-character images with diverse visual complexities to determine the conditions for accurate recognition. Our findings reveal that multimodal LLMs can match conventional OCR methods at about 300 ppi, yet their performance deteriorates significantly below 150 ppi. Additionally, we observe a very weak correlation between visual complexity and misrecognitions, whereas a conventional OCR-specific model exhibits no correlation. These results suggest that image resolution and visual complexity may play an important role in the reliable application of multimodal LLMs to OCR tasks that require precise character-level accuracy.