# Understanding Inequality of LLM Fact-Checking over Geographic Regions with Agent and Retrieval models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.22877 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.22877/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 32 of its 62 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 28 Mar 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Web, search, and research agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/web-search-and-research-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 32)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.05355/) (2018)
- [FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14251/) (2023)
- [The State and Fate of Linguistic Diversity and Inclusion in the NLP World](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.09095/) (2020)
- [Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.06476/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Automated Fact-Checking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.11896/) (2021)
- [Check Your Facts and Try Again: Improving Large Language Models with External Knowledge and Automated Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.12813/) (2023)
- [ChatIE: Zero-Shot Information Extraction via Chatting with ChatGPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.10205/) (2023)
- [XGLUE: A New Benchmark Dataset for Cross-lingual Pre-training, Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.01401/) (2020)
- [Is ChatGPT better than Human Annotators? Potential and Limitations of ChatGPT in Explaining Implicit Hate Speech](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.07736/) (2023)
- [Exploring the Limits of ChatGPT for Query or Aspect-based Text Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.08081/) (2023)
- [Towards LLM-based Fact Verification on News Claims with a Hierarchical Step-by-Step Prompting Method](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.00305/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models are Geographically Biased](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.02680/) (2024)
- [WikiChat: Stopping the Hallucination of Large Language Model Chatbots by Few-Shot Grounding on Wikipedia](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14292/) (2023)
- [Towards Few-Shot Fact-Checking via Perplexity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.09535/) (2021)
- [AmericasNLI: Evaluating Zero-shot Natural Language Understanding of Pretrained Multilingual Models in Truly Low-resource Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08726/) (2021)
- [Where Are the Facts? Searching for Fact-checked Information to Alleviate the Spread of Fake News](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.03159/) (2020)
- [ChatGPT versus Traditional Question Answering for Knowledge Graphs: Current Status and Future Directions Towards Knowledge Graph Chatbots](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.06466/) (2023)
- [Missing Counter-Evidence Renders NLP Fact-Checking Unrealistic for Misinformation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.13865/) (2022)
- [Reinforcement Learning-based Counter-Misinformation Response Generation: A Case Study of COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.06433/) (2023)
- [The Perils & Promises of Fact-checking with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.13549/) (2023)
- [The Surprising Performance of Simple Baselines for Misinformation Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.06952/) (2021)
- [RAGAR, Your Falsehood Radar: RAG-Augmented Reasoning for Political Fact-Checking using Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.12065/) (2024)
- [Fact-checking information from large language models can decrease headline discernment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10800/) (2023)
- [Multi-FAct: Assessing Factuality of Multilingual LLMs using FActScore](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.18045/) (2024)
- [Combating Disinformation in a Social Media Age](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.07388/) (2020)
- [Missci: Reconstructing Fallacies in Misrepresented Science](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.03181/) (2024)
- [Multimodal Large Language Models to Support Real-World Fact-Checking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03627/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Fact-checking is a potentially useful application of Large Language Models (LLMs) to combat the growing dissemination of disinformation. However, the performance of LLMs varies across geographic regions. In this paper, we evaluate the factual accuracy of open and private models across a diverse set of regions and scenarios. Using a dataset containing 600 fact-checked statements balanced across six global regions we examine three experimental setups of fact-checking a statement: (1) when just the statement is available, (2) when an LLM-based agent with Wikipedia access is utilized, and (3) as a best case scenario when a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system provided with the official fact check is employed. Our findings reveal that regardless of the scenario and LLM used, including GPT-4, Claude Sonnet, and LLaMA, statements from the Global North perform substantially better than those from the Global South. Furthermore, this gap is broadened for the more realistic case of a Wikipedia agent-based system, highlighting that overly general knowledge bases have a limited ability to address region-specific nuances. These results underscore the urgent need for better dataset balancing and robust retrieval strategies to enhance LLM fact-checking capabilities, particularly in geographically diverse contexts.