# CodeIF-Bench: Evaluating Instruction-Following Capabilities of Large Language Models in Interactive Code Generation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.22688 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.22688/

## Key facts

- Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 32 of its 46 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 32)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11916/) (2022)
- [Program Synthesis with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07732/) (2021)
- [SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06770/) (2023)
- [Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10560/) (2022)
- [Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12950/) (2023)
- [Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07911/) (2023)
- [Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPS](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.09938/) (2021)
- [WizardCoder: Empowering Code Large Language Models with Evol-Instruct](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.08568/) (2023)
- [MLLM-as-a-Judge: Assessing Multimodal LLM-as-a-Judge with Vision-Language Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.04788/) (2024)
- [RepoCoder: Repository-Level Code Completion Through Iterative Retrieval and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.12570/) (2023)
- [DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11931/) (2024)
- [Humans or LLMs as the Judge? A Study on Judgement Biases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.10669/) (2024)
- [MT-Bench-101: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Multi-Turn Dialogues](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14762/) (2024)
- [OpenCodeInterpreter: Integrating Code Generation with Execution and Refinement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14658/) (2024)
- [Do Users Write More Insecure Code with AI Assistants?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.03622/) (2022)
- [ClassEval: A Manually-Crafted Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Class-level Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.01861/) (2023)
- [InFoBench: Evaluating Instruction Following Ability in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.03601/) (2024)
- [Preference Leakage: A Contamination Problem in LLM-as-a-judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.01534/) (2025)
- [Multi-IF: Benchmarking LLMs on Multi-Turn and Multilingual Instructions Following](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.15553/) (2024)
- [Automating Code Review Activities by Large-Scale Pre-training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.09095/) (2022)
- [MT-Eval: A Multi-Turn Capabilities Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.16745/) (2024)
- [DevEval: A Manually-Annotated Code Generation Benchmark Aligned with Real-World Code Repositories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.19856/) (2024)
- [Systematic Evaluation of LLM-as-a-Judge in LLM Alignment Tasks: Explainable Metrics and Diverse Prompt Templates](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.13006/) (2024)
- [Bugs in Large Language Models Generated Code: An Empirical Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.08937/) (2024)
- [Can It Edit? Evaluating the Ability of Large Language Models to Follow Code Editing Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.12450/) (2023)
- [A Taxonomy for Human-LLM Interaction Modes: An Initial Exploration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.00405/) (2024)
- [CodeIF: Benchmarking the Instruction-Following Capabilities of Large Language Models for Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.19166/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [LLaDA2.0: Scaling Up Diffusion Language Models to 100B](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.15745/) (2025)
- [SlopCodeBench: Benchmarking How Coding Agents Degrade Over Long-Horizon Iterative Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.24755/) (2026)
- [One Battle After Another: Probing LLMs' Limits on Multi-Turn Instruction Following with a Benchmark Evolving Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.03508/) (2025)
- [KAT-Coder Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.18779/) (2025)
- [Revisiting the Reliability of Language Models in Instruction-Following](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.14754/) (2025)
- [OSS-Bench: Benchmark Generator for Coding LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.12331/) (2025)
- [ClarifyCodeBench: Evaluating LLMs on Clarifying Ambiguous Requirements for Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.00711/) (2026)
- [Benchmarking AI Models in Software Engineering: A Review, Search Tool, and Unified Approach for Elevating Benchmark Quality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.05860/) (2025)
- [Harness-IF: Evaluating Instruction Following Across Instruction Surfaces in Coding Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.11727/) (2026)
- [CodeSpec: Dual Executable Specifications for Agentic Long-Horizon Feature Development](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.26777/) (2026)
- [CodeAlignBench: Assessing Code Generation Models on Developer-Preferred Code Adjustments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.27565/) (2025)
- [PACIFIC: a framework for generating benchmarks to check Precise Automatically Checked Instruction Following In Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.10713/) (2025)
- [Failing to Explore: Language Models on Interactive Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.22345/) (2026)
- [EduPluginBench: Executable Assurance for AI-Generated Educational Plugins](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.00739/) (2026)
- [MTAC-IFBench: Benchmarking Instruction-Following in Multi-Turn Agentic Coding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.14992/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional performance in code generation tasks and have become indispensable programming assistants for developers. However, existing code generation benchmarks primarily assess the functional correctness of code generated by LLMs in single-turn interactions. They offer limited insight into LLMs' abilities to generate code that strictly follows users' instructions in multi-turn interaction scenarios. In this paper, we introduce CodeIF-Bench, a benchmark for evaluating the instruction-following capabilities of LLMs in interactive code generation. Specifically, CodeIF-Bench incorporates nine types of verifiable instructions aligned with the real-world software development requirements, which can be independently and objectively validated through specified test cases, facilitating the evaluation of instruction-following capability in multi-turn interactions. In both Static Conversation and Dynamic Conversation settings, we evaluate the performance of 6 state-of-the-art LLMs and summarize the important factors, additional repository context and gradually increasing interaction history influencing the instruction-following ability of LLMs in multi-turn interactions. Furthermore, we identify the potential direction for improvement: context management. The code and data are available at hrefhttps://github.com/zhu-zhu-ding/CodeIF-Benchhttps://github.com/zhu-zhu-ding/CodeIF-Bench.