# Camera Model Identification with SPAIR-Swin and Entropy based Non-Homogeneous Patches

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.22120 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.22120/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 8 of its 32 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 28 Mar 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01703/) (2019)
- [Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.1556/) (2014)
- [Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.14030/) (2021)
- [MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.04381/) (2018)
- [CBAM: Convolutional Block Attention Module](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.06521/) (2018)
- [Res2Net: A New Multi-scale Backbone Architecture](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.01169/) (2019)
- [The Forchheim Image Database for Camera Identification in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.02241/) (2020)
- [RemNet: Remnant Convolutional Neural Network for Camera Model Identification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.00694/) (2019)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Source camera model identification (SCMI) plays a pivotal role in image forensics with applications including authenticity verification and copyright protection. For identifying the camera model used to capture a given image, we propose SPAIR-Swin, a novel model combining a modified spatial attention mechanism and inverted residual block (SPAIR) with a Swin Transformer. SPAIR-Swin effectively captures both global and local features, enabling robust identification of artifacts such as noise patterns that are particularly effective for SCMI. Additionally, unlike conventional methods focusing on homogeneous patches, we propose a patch selection strategy for SCMI that emphasizes high-entropy regions rich in patterns and textures. Extensive evaluations on four benchmark SCMI datasets demonstrate that SPAIR-Swin outperforms existing methods, achieving patch-level accuracies of 99.45%, 98.39%, 99.45%, and 97.46% and image-level accuracies of 99.87%, 99.32%, 100%, and 98.61% on the Dresden, Vision, Forchheim, and Socrates datasets, respectively. Our findings highlight that high-entropy patches, which contain high-frequency information such as edge sharpness, noise, and compression artifacts, are more favorable in improving SCMI accuracy. Code will be made available upon request.