# Privacy in Immersive Extended Reality: Exploring User Perceptions, Concerns, and Coping Strategies

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.21010 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.21010/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 26 Mar 2025.

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [PRISM-XR: Empowering Privacy-Aware XR Collaboration with Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.10154/) (2026)
- [Who is Responsible When AI Fails? Mapping Causes, Entities, and Consequences of AI Privacy and Ethical Incidents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.01029/) (2025)
- [From Fragmentation to Integration: Exploring the Design Space of AI Agents for Human-as-the-Unit Privacy Management](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.05016/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Extended Reality (XR) technology is changing online interactions, but its granular data collection sensors may be more invasive to user privacy than web, mobile, and the Internet of Things technologies. Despite an increased interest in studying developers' concerns about XR device privacy, user perceptions have rarely been addressed. We surveyed 464 XR users to assess their awareness, concerns, and coping strategies around XR data in 18 scenarios. Our findings demonstrate that many factors, such as data types and sensitivity, affect users' perceptions of privacy in XR. However, users' limited awareness of XR sensors' granular data collection capabilities, such as involuntary body signals of emotional responses, restricted the range of privacy-protective strategies they used. Our results highlight a need to enhance users' awareness of data privacy threats in XR, design privacy-choice interfaces tailored to XR environments, and develop transparent XR data practices.