# SEAlign: Alignment Training for Software Engineering Agent

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.18455 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.18455/

## Key facts

- Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 24 of its 45 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Software engineering coding agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/software-engineering-coding-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10560/) (2022)
- [LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.07974/) (2024)
- [Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCode](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.07814/) (2022)
- [DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming -- The Rise of Code Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.14196/) (2024)
- [OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.16741/) (2024)
- [WizardCoder: Empowering Code Large Language Models with Evol-Instruct](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.08568/) (2023)
- [Executable Code Actions Elicit Better LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01030/) (2024)
- [StarCoder 2 and The Stack v2: The Next Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.19173/) (2024)
- [LIMO: Less is More for Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.03387/) (2025)
- [Agentless: Demystifying LLM-based Software Engineering Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.01489/) (2024)
- [Training Software Engineering Agents and Verifiers with SWE-Gym](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.21139/) (2024)
- [CodeAgent: Enhancing Code Generation with Tool-Integrated Agent Systems for Real-World Repo-level Coding Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.07339/) (2024)
- [AutoCodeRover: Autonomous Program Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.05427/) (2024)
- [Step-DPO: Step-wise Preference Optimization for Long-chain Reasoning of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.18629/) (2024)
- [Iterative Reasoning Preference Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.19733/) (2024)
- [Self-Play Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.00675/) (2024)
- [A Survey of Machine Learning for Big Code and Naturalness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.06182/) (2017)
- [RepoGraph: Enhancing AI Software Engineering with Repository-level Code Graph](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.14684/) (2024)
- [SWE-Fixer: Training Open-Source LLMs for Effective and Efficient GitHub Issue Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.05040/) (2025)
- [Lingma SWE-GPT: An Open Development-Process-Centric Language Model for Automated Software Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.00622/) (2024)
- [CodeDPO: Aligning Code Models with Self Generated and Verified Source Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.05605/) (2024)
- [Code-Optimise: Self-Generated Preference Data for Correctness and Efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12502/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [Trae Agent: An LLM-based Agent for Software Engineering with Test-time Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.23370/) (2025)
- [Issue Localization via LLM-Driven Iterative Code Graph Searching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.22424/) (2025)
- [Is Vibe Coding Safe? Benchmarking Vulnerability of Agent-Generated Code in Real-World Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.03262/) (2025)
- [Tool-integrated Reinforcement Learning for Repo Deep Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.03012/) (2025)
- [WebGen-Agent: Enhancing Interactive Website Generation with Multi-Level Feedback and Step-Level Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.22644/) (2025)
- [A Comprehensive Survey on Benchmarks and Solutions in Software Engineering of LLM-Empowered Agentic System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.09721/) (2025)
- [Co-PatcheR: Collaborative Software Patching with Component(s)-specific Small Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.18955/) (2025)
- [SWE-Factory: Your Automated Factory for Issue Resolution Training Data and Evaluation Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.10954/) (2025)
- [Agentic Software Issue Resolution with Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.22256/) (2025)
- [FullStack-Agent: Enhancing Agentic Full-Stack Web Coding via Development-Oriented Testing and Repository Back-Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.03798/) (2026)
- [SecureVibe: Making Vibe Coding More Secure](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.38606/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in code generation models have demonstrated impressive capabilities in automating software development tasks, yet these models still struggle in real-world software engineering scenarios. Although current training methods, particularly post-training, excel at solving competitive programming problems, they fail to adequately prepare models for the complexities of practical software development. This misalignment raises the critical question: Are existing alignment training methods well suited for real-world software engineering tasks? In this study, we identify this issue and propose SEAlign, a novel alignment framework designed to bridge the gap between code generation models and real-world software development tasks. SEAlign leverages the unique characteristics of software engineering processes, including high-quality workflow steps, to enhance model capabilities. Our framework further employs Monte Carlo Tree Search for fine-grained alignment in multi-step decision processes, followed by preference optimization on critical actions to ensure models meet real-world requirements. We evaluate SEAlign on three standard agentic benchmarks for real-world software engineering, including HumanEvalFix, SWE-Bench-Lite, and SWE-Bench-Verified. Experimental results demonstrate state-of-the-art performance with minimal training overhead. In addition, we develop an agent-based software development platform using SEAlign, which successfully automates the creation of several small applications. Human evaluations of these applications highlight significant improvements in both task performance and user experience. Our findings underscore the potential of SEAlign to accelerate the adoption of large code models in real-world software development. We believe that this research makes a meaningful step towards fully automated software engineering.