# Visual Variational Autoencoder Prompt Tuning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.17650 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.17650/

## Key facts

- Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 19 of its 32 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Mar 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.14030/) (2021)
- [Visual Prompt Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.12119/) (2022)
- [MaPLe: Multi-modal Prompt Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03117/) (2022)
- [A Large-scale Study of Representation Learning with the Visual Task Adaptation Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.04867/) (2019)
- [Wasserstein Auto-Encoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.01558/) (2017)
- [Unified Vision and Language Prompt Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.07225/) (2022)
- [Variational Transformer Networks for Layout Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.02416/) (2021)
- [Parameter-efficient Model Adaptation for Vision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.16329/) (2022)
- [Revisiting Parameter-Efficient Tuning: Are We Really There Yet?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.07962/) (2022)
- [E^2VPT: An Effective and Efficient Approach for Visual Prompt Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13770/) (2023)
- [Diversity-Aware Meta Visual Prompting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08138/) (2023)
- [How Well Do Sparse Imagenet Models Transfer?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.13445/) (2021)
- [DPCore: Dynamic Prompt Coreset for Continual Test-Time Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.10737/) (2024)
- [Visual Fourier Prompt Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.01327/) (2024)
- [OT-VP: Optimal Transport-guided Visual Prompting for Test-Time Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.09498/) (2024)
- [Bayesian-guided Label Mapping for Visual Reprogramming](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.24018/) (2024)
- [CAD-VAE: Leveraging Correlation-Aware Latents for Comprehensive Fair Disentanglement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.07938/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Visual Instance-aware Prompt Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.07796/) (2025)
- [FOCUS: Fused Observation of Channels for Unveiling Spectra](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.14787/) (2025)
- [CTR-LoRA: Curvature-Aware and Trust-Region Guided Low-Rank Adaptation for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.15962/) (2025)
- [Prime Once, then Reprogram Locally: An Efficient Alternative to Black-Box Service Model Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.01474/) (2026)
- [Self-Supervised Visual Prompting for Cross-Domain Road Damage Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.12410/) (2025)
- [DeCo-DETR: Decoupled Cognition DETR for efficient Open-Vocabulary Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.02753/) (2026)
- [Visual Prompt-Agnostic Evolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.20232/) (2026)
- [Layer-Specific Prompt Fusion Discovery via Differentiable Search in Vision Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.26379/) (2026)
- [Boosting Active Learning with Knowledge Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.15805/) (2025)
- [Adapting Vision Foundation Models with Cascaded Semantics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.05393/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) has emerged as a crucial approach for adapting large vision transformers to downstream tasks without the prohibitive computational costs of full fine-tuning. While existing visual prompt tuning (VPT) methods have made significant strides, they predominantly rely on static, domain-specific prompts that fail to capture the rich visual diversity within individual instances. This paper introduces V2APT (Visual Variational Autoencoder Prompt Tuning), a novel framework that generates dynamic, input-dependent prompts using a variational autoencoder architecture. By learning a latent representation of image-specific features and decoding them into customized prompts, V2APT adapts to the unique visual characteristics of each input. Extensive experiments on FGVC, HTA, and VTAB-1k benchmarks demonstrate that our approach consistently outperforms state-of-the-art PEFT methods. Notably, V2APT achieves +3.2% improvement over VPT-Deep on HTA, with an average performance gain of +2.0% across all three datasets.
