# MAPS: Multi-Agent Personality Shaping for Collaborative Reasoning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.16905 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.16905/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 23 of its 55 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Mar 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning for agents, planning and code](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-for-agents-planning-and-code/)
- LLM agents and tool use / [Social simulation and multi-agent debate](https://mlsanity.com/agents/social-simulation-and-multi-agent-debate/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Qwen Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16609/) (2023)
- [LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03326/) (2024)
- [AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.08155/) (2023)
- [MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02255/) (2023)
- [Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05271/) (2024)
- [OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14008/) (2024)
- [MM-LLMs: Recent Advances in MultiModal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.13601/) (2024)
- [Auto-GPT for Online Decision Making: Benchmarks and Additional Opinions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.02224/) (2023)
- [Multimodal ArXiv: A Dataset for Improving Scientific Comprehension of Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.00231/) (2024)
- [The Revolution of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.12451/) (2024)
- [Can MLLMs Reason in Multimodality? EMMA: An Enhanced MultiModal ReAsoning Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.05444/) (2025)
- [Metacognitive Capabilities of LLMs: An Exploration in Mathematical Problem Solving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.12205/) (2024)
- [A Survey on Benchmarks of Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.08632/) (2024)
- [ChemVLM: Exploring the Power of Multimodal Large Language Models in Chemistry Area](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.07246/) (2024)
- [Corex: Pushing the Boundaries of Complex Reasoning through Multi-Model Collaboration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.00280/) (2023)
- [Voting or Consensus? Decision-Making in Multi-Agent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.19130/) (2025)
- [AI-assisted coding: Experiments with GPT-4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.13187/) (2023)
- [IsoBench: Benchmarking Multimodal Foundation Models on Isomorphic Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.01266/) (2024)
- [Capabilities of Large Language Models in Control Engineering: A Benchmark Study on GPT-4, Claude 3 Opus, and Gemini 1.0 Ultra](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.03647/) (2024)
- [MM-PhyRLHF: Reinforcement Learning Framework for Multimodal Physics Question-Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.12926/) (2024)
- [GKG-LLM: A Unified Framework for Generalized Knowledge Graph Construction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.11227/) (2025)
- [Diagram-Driven Course Questions Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.17771/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [From AI for Science to Agentic Science: A Survey on Autonomous Scientific Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.14111/) (2025)
- [Hybrid-DMKG: A Hybrid Reasoning Framework over Dynamic Multimodal Knowledge Graphs for Multimodal Multihop QA with Knowledge Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.00881/) (2025)
- [A3-Bench: Benchmarking Memory-Driven Scientific Reasoning via Anchor and Attractor Activation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.09274/) (2026)
- [GeoChallenge: A Multi-Answer Multiple-Choice Benchmark for Geometric Reasoning with Diagrams](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.19252/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Collaborative reasoning with multiple agents offers the potential for more robust and diverse problem-solving. However, existing approaches often suffer from homogeneous agent behaviors and lack of reflective and rethinking capabilities. We propose Multi-Agent Personality Shaping (MAPS), a novel framework that enhances reasoning through agent diversity and internal critique. Inspired by the Big Five personality theory, MAPS assigns distinct personality traits to individual agents, shaping their reasoning styles and promoting heterogeneous collaboration. To enable deeper and more adaptive reasoning, MAPS introduces a Critic agent that reflects on intermediate outputs, revisits flawed steps, and guides iterative refinement. This integration of personality-driven agent design and structured collaboration improves both reasoning depth and flexibility. Empirical evaluations across three benchmarks demonstrate the strong performance of MAPS, with further analysis confirming its generalizability across different large language models and validating the benefits of multi-agent collaboration.