# Exploring the Reliability of Self-explanation and its Relationship with Classification in Language Model-driven Financial Analysis

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.15985 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.15985/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 20 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11366/) (2023)
- [Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.03629/) (2022)
- [Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phone](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.14219/) (2024)
- [Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10355/) (2023)
- [DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.04434/) (2024)
- [Reasoning with Language Model is Planning with World Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14992/) (2023)
- [Can language models learn from explanations in context?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02329/) (2022)
- [The Unreliability of Explanations in Few-shot Prompting for Textual Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.03401/) (2022)
- [FinBen: A Holistic Financial Benchmark for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.12659/) (2024)
- [Verify-and-Edit: A Knowledge-Enhanced Chain-of-Thought Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.03268/) (2023)
- [The Troubling Emergence of Hallucination in Large Language Models -- An Extensive Definition, Quantification, and Prescriptive Remediations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.04988/) (2023)
- [FA*IR: A Fair Top-k Ranking Algorithm](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.06368/) (2017)
- [Are ChatGPT and GPT-4 General-Purpose Solvers for Financial Text Analytics? A Study on Several Typical Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.05862/) (2023)
- [FinTextQA: A Dataset for Long-form Financial Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.09980/) (2024)
- [Measuring and Improving Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.04461/) (2023)
- [Learning to Generate Explainable Stock Predictions using Self-Reflective Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03659/) (2024)
- [Re-ReST: Reflection-Reinforced Self-Training for Language Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01495/) (2024)
- [Is ChatGPT a Financial Expert? Evaluating Language Models on Financial Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.12664/) (2023)
- [AutoScore-Imbalance: An interpretable machine learning tool for development of clinical scores with rare events data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.06039/) (2021)
- [Sentiment trading with large language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.19245/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [A Citation-Grounded Benchmark for Trustworthy Earnings Call Transcript Analysis with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.00969/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Language models (LMs) have exhibited exceptional versatility in reasoning and in-depth financial analysis through their proprietary information processing capabilities. Previous research focused on evaluating classification performance while often overlooking explainability or pre-conceived that refined explanation corresponds to higher classification accuracy. Using a public dataset in finance domain, we quantitatively evaluated self-explanations by LMs, focusing on their factuality and causality. We identified the statistically significant relationship between the accuracy of classifications and the factuality or causality of self-explanations. Our study built an empirical foundation for approximating classification confidence through self-explanations and for optimizing classification via proprietary reasoning.
