# More Women, Same Stereotypes: Unpacking the Gender Bias Paradox in Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.15904 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.15904/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 15 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- ["Kelly is a Warm Person, Joseph is a Role Model": Gender Biases in LLM-Generated Reference Letters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.09219/) (2023)
- [Gender bias and stereotypes in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.14921/) (2023)
- [What's in a Name? Auditing Large Language Models for Race and Gender Bias](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14875/) (2024)
- [The Unequal Opportunities of Large Language Models: Revealing Demographic Bias through Job Recommendations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.02053/) (2023)
- ["You Gotta be a Doctor, Lin": An Investigation of Name-Based Bias of Large Language Models in Employment Recommendations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12232/) (2024)
- [Decoding Biases: Automated Methods and LLM Judges for Gender Bias Detection in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03907/) (2024)
- [Do Large Language Models Discriminate in Hiring Decisions on the Basis of Race, Ethnicity, and Gender?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.10486/) (2024)
- [An Open-Source Cultural Consensus Approach to Name-Based Gender Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.01714/) (2022)
- [Assessing Gender Bias in LLMs: Comparing LLM Outputs with Human Perceptions and Official Statistics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.13738/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [From Individuals to Interactions: Benchmarking Gender Bias in Multimodal Large Language Models from the Lens of Social Relationship](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.23101/) (2025)
- [The Reasoning Trap: An Information-Theoretic Bound on Closed-System Multi-Step LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.01704/) (2026)
- [Evaluating Implicit Biases in LLM Reasoning through Logic Grid Puzzles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.06160/) (2025)
- [Fair outputs, Biased Internals: Causal Potency and Asymmetry of Latent Bias in LLMs for High-Stakes Decisions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.15217/) (2026)
- [Convergence in Science, Divergence in Religion: Calibrated Framing Differences Across Wikipedia's Language Editions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.21821/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing, yet concerns persist regarding their tendency to reflect or amplify social biases. This study introduces a novel evaluation framework to uncover gender biases in LLMs: using free-form storytelling to surface biases embedded within the models. A systematic analysis of ten prominent LLMs shows a consistent pattern of overrepresenting female characters across occupations, likely due to supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). Paradoxically, despite this overrepresentation, the occupational gender distributions produced by these LLMs align more closely with human stereotypes than with real-world labor data. This highlights the challenge and importance of implementing balanced mitigation measures to promote fairness and prevent the establishment of potentially new biases. We release the prompts and LLM-generated stories at GitHub.