# An Investigation of Beam Density on LiDAR Object Detection Performance

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.15087 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.15087/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 44 of its 56 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 44)

- [PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00593/) (2016)
- [nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.11027/) (2019)
- [SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detector](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.02325/) (2015)
- [Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.04838/) (2019)
- [VoxelNet: End-to-End Learning for Point Cloud Based 3D Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.06396/) (2017)
- [PointRCNN: 3D Object Proposal Generation and Detection from Point Cloud](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.04244/) (2018)
- [PV-RCNN: Point-Voxel Feature Set Abstraction for 3D Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.13192/) (2019)
- [Voxel Transformer for 3D Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.02497/) (2021)
- [PV-RCNN++: Point-Voxel Feature Set Abstraction With Local Vector Representation for 3D Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.00463/) (2021)
- [One Million Scenes for Autonomous Driving: ONCE Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.11037/) (2021)
- [3D Object Detection with Pointformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.11409/) (2020)
- [Embracing Single Stride 3D Object Detector with Sparse Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.06375/) (2021)
- [ST3D: Self-training for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation on 3D Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.05346/) (2021)
- [Train in Germany, Test in The USA: Making 3D Object Detectors Generalize](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.08139/) (2020)
- [Not All Points Are Equal: Learning Highly Efficient Point-based Detectors for 3D LiDAR Point Clouds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11139/) (2022)
- [DSVT: Dynamic Sparse Voxel Transformer with Rotated Sets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.06051/) (2023)
- [Benchmarking Robustness of 3D Object Detection to Common Corruptions in Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11040/) (2023)
- [PillarNet: Real-Time and High-Performance Pillar-based 3D Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.07403/) (2022)
- [SPG: Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for 3D Object Detection via Semantic Point Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.06709/) (2021)
- [Zenseact Open Dataset: A large-scale and diverse multimodal dataset for autonomous driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.02008/) (2023)
- [LargeKernel3D: Scaling up Kernels in 3D Sparse CNNs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.10555/) (2022)
- [Unsupervised Domain Adaptive 3D Detection with Multi-Level Consistency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.11355/) (2021)
- [ST3D++: Denoised Self-training for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation on 3D Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.06682/) (2021)
- [LiDAR Distillation: Bridging the Beam-Induced Domain Gap for 3D Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.14956/) (2022)
- [PillarNeXt: Rethinking Network Designs for 3D Object Detection in LiDAR Point Clouds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.04925/) (2023)
- [SAFDNet: A Simple and Effective Network for Fully Sparse 3D Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.05817/) (2024)
- [Benchmarking the Robustness of LiDAR-Camera Fusion for 3D Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.14951/) (2022)
- [Ithaca365: Dataset and Driving Perception under Repeated and Challenging Weather Conditions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.01166/) (2022)
- [HEDNet: A Hierarchical Encoder-Decoder Network for 3D Object Detection in Point Clouds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.20234/) (2023)
- [OcTr: Octree-based Transformer for 3D Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.12621/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Accurate 3D object detection is a critical component of autonomous driving, enabling vehicles to perceive their surroundings with precision and make informed decisions. LiDAR sensors, widely used for their ability to provide detailed 3D measurements, are key to achieving this capability. However, variations between training and inference data can cause significant performance drops when object detection models are employed in different sensor settings. One critical factor is beam density, as inference on sparse, cost-effective LiDAR sensors is often preferred in real-world applications. Despite previous work addressing the beam-density-induced domain gap, substantial knowledge gaps remain, particularly concerning dense 128-beam sensors in cross-domain scenarios. To gain better understanding of the impact of beam density on domain gaps, we conduct a comprehensive investigation that includes an evaluation of different object detection architectures. Our architecture evaluation reveals that combining voxel- and point-based approaches yields superior cross-domain performance by leveraging the strengths of both representations. Building on these findings, we analyze beam-density-induced domain gaps and argue that these domain gaps must be evaluated in conjunction with other domain shifts. Contrary to conventional beliefs, our experiments reveal that detectors benefit from training on denser data and exhibit robustness to beam density variations during inference.